vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP (FCF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($133.7M vs $104.4M, roughly 1.3× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 28.1% vs -55.2%, a 83.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.0% vs 11.5%). Over the past eight quarters, FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (5.5% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
First Commonwealth Financial Corp is a Pennsylvania-based regional financial services holding company. It offers consumer and commercial banking products, loans, wealth management, and insurance services for individuals, small and mid-sized enterprises across central and western Pennsylvania and Ohio.
AP vs FCF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $133.7M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $37.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | — |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 28.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 13.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 14.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $133.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $137.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $136.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $131.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $118.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $120.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $120.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $37.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $44.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $41.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $33.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $32.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $35.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $37.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 40.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 38.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 32.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 34.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 37.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 33.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 38.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 30.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 27.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 29.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | 26.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 30.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.39 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.32 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $0.31 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $0.36 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $154.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $12.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $154.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $261.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $262.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $262.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $262.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $263.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $136.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $136.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $1.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.3B | ||
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $12.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $12.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $12.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $11.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $12.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $11.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.10× | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.17× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.17× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 0.19× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 0.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 0.10× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $187.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $30.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $55.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $129.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $53.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $22.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $171.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $113.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 124.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 94.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 12.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.91× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 1.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 3.61× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.61× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
FCF
Segment breakdown not available.
