vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and REGIS CORP (RGS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($104.4M vs $57.1M, roughly 1.8× REGIS CORP). REGIS CORP runs the higher net margin — 0.8% vs -55.2%, a 56.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, REGIS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.3% vs 11.5%). REGIS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($891.0K vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, REGIS CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
REGIS CORPRGSEarnings & Financial Report
Regis Corporation is an American operator of hair salons. As of August 2021, it has 5,563 franchised and 276 company-owned salons. Its headquarters are in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
AP vs RGS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $57.1M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $456.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 10.8% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 0.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 22.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | -94.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $60.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $57.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $46.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $46.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $49.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $49.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | $456.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $1.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $116.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $250.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $7.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-853.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $91.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | 10.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 8.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 192.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 184.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | -4.7% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | $0.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.49 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $43.67 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $2.71 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $38.40 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $-1.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $18.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $113.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $188.7M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $588.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 0.60× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $16.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $10.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $5.9M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | $113.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $111.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $110.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $112.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $111.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $95.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $99.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $179.7M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | $188.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $187.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $185.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $68.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $66.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $56.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $56.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $-35.8M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | $588.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $592.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $599.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $511.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $530.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $508.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $530.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $543.7M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | 0.60× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 0.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 0.60× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.67× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.69× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $891.0K |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 3.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $14.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $2.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $-277.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | $891.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $5.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-326.0K |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 3.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | -3.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -0.7% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.68× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 24.80× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | 0.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
RGS
| Franchise Segment | $37.9M | 66% |
| Royalty | $13.6M | 24% |
| Other | $2.8M | 5% |
| Fees | $1.8M | 3% |
| Franchise Fees | $1.0M | 2% |
