vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP (AP) and SunOpta Inc. (STKL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SunOpta Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($205.4M vs $104.4M, roughly 2.0× AMPCO PITTSBURGH CORP). SunOpta Inc. runs the higher net margin — 0.4% vs -55.2%, a 55.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SunOpta Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (16.6% vs 11.5%). SunOpta Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($12.1M vs $-64.0K). Over the past eight quarters, SunOpta Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.4% CAGR vs -2.6%).
Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation is a specialty steel manufacturer headquartered in Downtown Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. It is one of several companies to bear the Ampco name, and it should not be confused with the Milwaukee-based copper base alloy producer, Ampco Metal Inc.; the Miami-based cabinetry company; the Swiss aluminum corporation; or the Dallas-based tool company. Ampco was formed in 1929 and is a conglomerate made up of several previously established small steel makers. Five small compa...
SunOpta, Inc. is a multi-national food and mineral company headquartered in Eden Prairie, Minnesota and founded in 1973 in Canada.
AP vs STKL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $104.4M | $205.4M |
| Net Profit | $-57.7M | $816.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.4% |
| Operating Margin | -54.0% | 3.3% |
| Net Margin | -55.2% | 0.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.5% | 16.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1958.9% | 113.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.87 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $104.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $103.7M | $205.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.9M | $191.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.2M | $201.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $93.6M | $193.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $92.1M | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.1M | $169.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $110.0M | $184.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-57.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.2M | $816.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.3M | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1M | $4.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.1M | $-8.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.0M | $-6.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $-5.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 16.8% |
| Q4 25 | -54.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.1% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 5.5% |
| Q4 25 | -55.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.1% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.7% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.3% | -4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.1% | -3.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.5% | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.87 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | $0.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.36 | $0.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.06 | $0.04 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.10 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.10 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.14 | $0.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.7M | $2.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $117.9M | $250.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $32.6M | $162.8M |
| Total Assets | $495.4M | $694.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 3.61× | 1.54× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.0M | $2.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9M | $2.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.4M | $1.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.8M | $2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.8M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | $117.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.0M | $250.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $115.9M | $263.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $115.0M | $260.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.4M | $265.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $116.0M | $289.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $119.4M | $303.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $116.2M | $258.8M |
| Q4 25 | $32.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.7M | $159.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.6M | $154.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.9M | $148.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $61.3M | $155.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $58.0M | $158.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.3M | $163.6M |
| Q4 25 | $495.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $524.4M | $694.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $537.2M | $704.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $536.2M | $690.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $530.9M | $668.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $547.4M | $699.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $704.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $565.8M | $671.8M |
| Q4 25 | 3.61× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.98× | 1.54× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.85× | 1.65× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.78× | 1.68× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.98× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.89× | 1.87× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.06× | 1.91× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.06× | 1.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.7M | $16.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-64.0K | $12.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.1% | 5.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.7% | 2.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 20.03× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-8.1M | $36.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.3M | $22.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.5M | $33.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.4M | $17.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.3M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.5M | $5.3M |
| Q4 25 | $-64.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-9.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.5M | $9.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7M | $24.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.4M | $11.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.0M | $-15.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.7M | $-2.3M |
| Q4 25 | -0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.5% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | -9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | -1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.3% | 2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.0% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.2% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.6% | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 20.03× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.62× | 4.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.64× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AP
| Forged And Cast Mill Rolls | $67.0M | 64% |
| Air Handling Systems | $14.3M | 14% |
| Heat Exchange Coils | $13.1M | 13% |
| Centrifugal Pumps | $10.3M | 10% |
| Forged Engineered Products | $4.0M | 4% |
STKL
| Beverages And Broths | $161.4M | 79% |
| Fruit Snacks | $40.9M | 20% |
| Ingredients | $3.1M | 2% |
