vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Amphenol (APH) and MIND CTI LTD (MNDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Amphenol is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.4B vs $4.9M, roughly 1317.8× MIND CTI LTD). MIND CTI LTD runs the higher net margin — 19.4% vs 18.6%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Amphenol produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.5B vs $4.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Amphenol's revenue compounded faster (40.6% CAGR vs -45.1%).
Amphenol Corporation is an American producer of electronic and fiber optic connectors, cable and interconnect systems such as coaxial cables. Amphenol is a portmanteau from the corporation's original name, American Phenolic Corp.
MIND CTI Ltd. is a global provider of billing and customer care solutions and messaging services for voice, data, video and content services. Headquartered in Yokneam, Israel; the company also has offices in the United States of America, Iaşi in Romania and in Germany.
APH vs MNDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.4B | $4.9M |
| Net Profit | $1.2B | $950.0K |
| Gross Margin | 38.2% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 26.8% | 16.5% |
| Net Margin | 18.6% | 19.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 49.1% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 60.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.93 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $6.4B | $4.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.2B | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.7B | $11.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.3B | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.0B | $16.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | $950.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $737.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $746.1M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $604.4M | $3.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $524.8M | $2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $548.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 38.2% | 55.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.1% | 48.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.3% | 55.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.6% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.6% | 50.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 33.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.5% | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.1% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.1% | 25.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.3% | 22.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 22.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 18.6% | 19.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 22.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 17.3% | 23.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.0% | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 23.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | $0.93 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.97 | $0.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.86 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.58 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.16 | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.48 | $0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.87 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $11.4B | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.4B | $23.0M |
| Total Assets | $36.2B | $30.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.09× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $11.4B | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $4.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.3B | $3.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | $14.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.4B | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.5B | $24.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5B | $24.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.8B | $24.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.5B | $24.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.0B | $24.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $36.2B | $30.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.1B | $30.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.7B | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.4B | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.6B | $31.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.6B | $31.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.54× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.56× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.41× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.7B | $4.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.5B | $4.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 22.8% | 81.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.44× | 4.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $4.4B | $14.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $847.1M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $704.0M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $664.1M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $599.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $4.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $3.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.3M | $4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $474.0M | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $522.8M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $505.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 22.8% | 81.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | 78.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.6% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.9% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.44× | 4.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.18× | 1.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.04× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.14× | 3.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.16× | 0.91× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.27× | 0.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.09× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APH
| Communications Solutions Segment | $3.5B | 54% |
| Harsh Environment Solutions Segment | $1.7B | 26% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $1.4B | 21% |
MNDO
Segment breakdown not available.
