vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. (APLE) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Apple Hospitality REIT, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($326.4M vs $268.0M, roughly 1.2× Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs 9.1%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs -2.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs -8.5%).
Ryman Hospitality Properties, Inc. is a hotel, resort, entertainment, and media company named for one of its assets: the Ryman Auditorium, a National Historic Landmark in Nashville, Tennessee. The company's legal lineage can be traced back to its time as a subsidiary of Edward Gaylord's Oklahoma Publishing Company; however, the backbone of the modern entity was formed with the company's acquisition of WSM, Inc. in 1983. This purchase resulted in the ownership of the Grand Ole Opry and associa...
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
APLE vs CRDO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $326.4M | $268.0M |
| Net Profit | $29.6M | $82.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 67.5% |
| Operating Margin | 15.2% | 29.4% |
| Net Margin | 9.1% | 30.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.0% | 272.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 82.5% | 2055.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $0.44 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $326.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $326.4M | $268.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $373.9M | $223.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $384.4M | $170.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $327.7M | $135.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $333.0M | $72.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $378.8M | $59.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $390.1M | $60.8M |
| Q1 26 | $29.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $82.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.9M | $63.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $63.6M | $36.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.2M | $29.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $-4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $56.3M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.9M | $-10.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.2% | 67.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 40.6% | 67.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.6% | 67.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.0% | 63.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.6% | 63.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.9% | 62.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.6% | 65.8% |
| Q1 26 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 15.2% | 29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 27.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.1% | 19.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.5% | 19.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.5% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 24.0% | -13.0% |
| Q1 26 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | 30.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.6% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.6% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | -5.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.9% | -16.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.0% | -17.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.13 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.13 | $0.44 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.21 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.27 | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.13 | $0.16 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.13 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.23 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.31 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.5M | $813.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.1B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $4.9B | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $8.5M | $813.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $50.3M | $479.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $431.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.9M | $379.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $383.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1M | $398.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2M | $410.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.1B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.2B | $781.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.2B | $681.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.2B | $618.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $567.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $553.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $540.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $905.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $809.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.9B | $719.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.0B | $638.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.1B | $601.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.46× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.46× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $61.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $38.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 14.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.75× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $143.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $370.2M | $61.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $126.4M | $54.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.8M | $57.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.1M | $4.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $405.4M | $10.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.2M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $127.3M | $4.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $282.0M | $38.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $109.0M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $96.2M | $54.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.5M | $-383.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $327.1M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $113.1M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $115.0M | $962.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 86.4% | 14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.2% | 23.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.0% | 31.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | -0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.2% | -16.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | -21.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.0% | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.5% | 30.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.0% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.50× | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.49× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.71× | 1.58× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.57× | 0.14× | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.28× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.72× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APLE
| Comparable Hotels Total Revenue | $319.2M | 98% |
| Other | $7.1M | 2% |
| RevPAR (Comparable Hotels) | $106.9K | 0% |
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
