vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (APLS) and Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. (CVGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($199.9M vs $154.8M, roughly 1.3× Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc.). On growth, Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-5.2% vs -5.9%). Commercial Vehicle Group, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.7M vs $-14.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.7% CAGR vs -10.8%).
Apellis Pharmaceuticals is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing targeted therapies that modulate the complement system to address serious unmet medical needs. Its core products target ophthalmic conditions like geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration, as well as rare hematological and autoimmune disorders, with primary operations in the United States and European markets.
WABCO Holdings, Inc. was a U.S.-based provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. In 2007, the Vehicle Control Systems was spun off as WABCO Holdings Inc., an American provider of electronic braking, stability, suspension and transmission automation systems for heavy-duty commercial vehicles. Their products are present in many commercial vehicles such as trucks, buses, trailers and off-highway vehicles but they ...
APLS vs CVGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $199.9M | $154.8M |
| Net Profit | $-59.0M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.7% |
| Operating Margin | -25.6% | -1.2% |
| Net Margin | -29.5% | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.9% | -5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -62.2% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.40 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $199.9M | $154.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $458.6M | $152.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $178.5M | $172.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $166.8M | $169.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.5M | $163.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $196.8M | $171.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $199.7M | $193.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $172.3M | $194.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-59.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $215.7M | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-92.2M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-36.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-57.4M | $9.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-37.7M | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-66.4M | $2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.9% |
| Q4 25 | -25.6% | -1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.6% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.3% | -3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.0% | -0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -14.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.0% | 2.3% |
| Q4 25 | -29.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.0% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.6% | -2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.3% | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.2% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.9% | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -38.5% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.33 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.74 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.30 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.54 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $466.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $104.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $370.1M | $133.4M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $391.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.79× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $466.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $358.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $411.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $396.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $360.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $325.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $117.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $135.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $128.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $142.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.1M | $155.7M |
| Q4 25 | $370.1M | $133.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $401.2M | $136.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $156.3M | $142.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $164.2M | $136.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $228.5M | $135.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $237.1M | $179.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $264.3M | $169.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $266.7M | $175.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $391.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $400.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $821.4M | $429.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.3M | $419.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $885.1M | $424.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $901.9M | $495.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $904.5M | $503.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $831.9M | $509.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.79× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.72× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.84× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.35× | 0.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-14.2M | $12.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-14.3M | $8.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -7.1% | 5.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.1% | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $45.0M | $34.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-14.2M | $12.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.5M | $-1.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $18.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.4M | $15.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.4M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.1M | $-17.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-133.0M | $-2.4M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.3M | $8.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.3M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.4M | $17.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-53.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.3M | $-30.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-20.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-8.4M | $6.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-133.3M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | -7.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.0% | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | -18.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -77.3% | -3.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 3.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.50× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
APLS
| Syfovre | $155.2M | 78% |
| Empaveli Pegcetacoplan | $35.1M | 18% |
| Licensing And Other Revenue | $9.6M | 5% |
CVGI
| Global Seating | $70.7M | 46% |
| Global Electrical Systems | $49.7M | 32% |
| Trim Systems And Components | $34.4M | 22% |
