vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD (APWC) and BANCFIRST CORP (BANF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ASIA PACIFIC WIRE & CABLE CORP LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($225.3M vs $181.0M, roughly 1.2× BANCFIRST CORP).
Disney Networks Group Asia Pacific was a Hong Kong–based commercial broadcasting company operating multiple specialty television channels. The company was founded in 1991 by Hong Kong - Canadian businessman Richard Li.
BancFirst Corporation is an Oklahoma-based financial services holding company. The company operates three subsidiary banks, BancFirst, an Oklahoma state-chartered bank; and Pegasus Bank and Worthington Bank, both Texas state-chartered banks.
APWC vs BANF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2022 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $225.3M | $181.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $59.5M |
| Gross Margin | 7.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 2.2% | 41.6% |
| Net Margin | — | 32.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.75 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $181.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $175.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $169.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $164.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $162.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $163.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $153.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $151.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $62.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $62.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $56.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $56.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $58.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $50.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $50.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 45.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 42.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 42.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 35.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 34.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 34.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 33.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.85 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.85 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.66 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.68 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.51 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.50 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $1.9B |
| Total Assets | — | $14.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $14.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $14.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $14.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $13.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $12.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $285.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $237.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 130.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 26.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.79× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $430.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $285.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $78.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $261.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $77.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $66.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $237.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $64.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $224.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $94.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $56.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 130.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 137.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 61.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 37.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.79× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.25× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.37× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.62× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.32× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.