vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of AdvanSix Inc. (ASIX) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($517.5M vs $359.9M, roughly 1.4× AdvanSix Inc.). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs -0.8%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.5% vs 9.4%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $36.1M). Over the past eight quarters, WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC's revenue compounded faster (14.5% CAGR vs 3.4%).
AdvanSix Inc. is an American chemical company that produces nylon 6 and related chemicals such as caprolactam and ammonium sulfate fertilizers. It operated as Honeywell's Resins and Chemicals division until 2016, when it was spun off as a separate company. The unit accounted for 3 percent of Honeywell's sales at the time. For 2019, revenue is estimated at $1.4 billion. The company traces its lineage to the H. W. Jayne Company, established 1884 in Frankford, Pennsylvania.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
ASIX vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $359.9M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.8M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | -0.7% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | -0.8% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.4% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -892.9% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $359.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $374.5M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $410.0M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $377.8M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $329.1M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.2M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $453.5M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.6M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.4M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.3M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $352.0K | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $38.9M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.4% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.9% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.7% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.5% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.10 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.15 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.86 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.02 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.82 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.43 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $19.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $815.2M | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.7B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $19.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $815.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $818.2M | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $823.7M | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.4M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $774.6M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $766.4M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $746.6M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.6B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $63.7M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $36.1M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.0% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 7.7% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $6.4M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $63.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.1M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.4M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $64.2M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.3M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.2M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $36.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.0K | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-7.2M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-22.6M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $29.8M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.8M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.7M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.1% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.4% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.67× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.49× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | 182.29× | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.57× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.29× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ASIX
| Plant Nutrients | $140.0M | 39% |
| Chemical Intermediates | $92.8M | 26% |
| Caprolactam | $64.4M | 18% |
| Nylon Resins | $62.8M | 17% |
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
