vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. (DUOT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Aterian, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($15.1M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.6× DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.). DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. runs the higher net margin — -33.8% vs -52.5%, a 18.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (547.5% vs -38.5%). Aterian, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.0M vs $-18.6M). Over the past eight quarters, DUOS TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (149.0% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
DUOS Technologies Group Inc. develops and deploys AI-powered automation, inspection, and security solutions for railway transportation, critical infrastructure, and commercial clients across North America. Its offerings include real-time monitoring systems and safety tools that help customers boost efficiency, reduce risks, and strengthen site security.
ATER vs DUOT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $9.5M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-3.2M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | 26.7% |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | -36.1% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | -33.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 547.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | 6.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $9.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $5.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $1.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $1.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 36.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | 26.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | -22.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | -14.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | -36.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | -16.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | -60.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | -36.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | -211.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | -59.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | -212.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | -33.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | -15.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | -61.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | -42.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | -233.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | -43.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | -212.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | $48.6M |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $63.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $613.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | $48.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | $5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $63.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $34.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $35.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $22.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $-2.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | $-18.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | -196.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 167.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-37.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-2.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-3.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $2.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $-2.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $-18.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $-4.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-5.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | -196.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | -139.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | -69.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -105.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 166.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -90.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | -184.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | 167.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 93.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | 11.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | 20.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 58.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
DUOT
| Services And Consulting Related Parties | $8.5M | 90% |
| Other | $929.3K | 10% |
