vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP (GEOS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.6M vs $15.1M, roughly 1.7× Aterian, Inc.). GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP runs the higher net margin — -38.2% vs -52.5%, a 14.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-31.3% vs -38.5%). Aterian, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.0M vs $-17.6M). Over the past eight quarters, GEOSPACE TECHNOLOGIES CORP's revenue compounded faster (2.7% CAGR vs -13.5%).

Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.

Geospace Technologies Corporation is a manufacturer of specialized electronics and seismic data acquisition equipment used in the oil and gas industry. Geospace Technologies has been publicly traded on the NASDAQ stock exchange since November 1997.

ATER vs GEOS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
GEOS
GEOS
1.7× larger
GEOS
$25.6M
$15.1M
ATER
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
GEOS
GEOS
+7.2% gap
GEOS
-31.3%
-38.5%
ATER
Higher net margin
GEOS
GEOS
14.4% more per $
GEOS
-38.2%
-52.5%
ATER
More free cash flow
ATER
ATER
$16.5M more FCF
ATER
$-1.0M
$-17.6M
GEOS
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
GEOS
GEOS
Annualised
GEOS
2.7%
-13.5%
ATER

Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026

Metric
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Revenue
$15.1M
$25.6M
Net Profit
$-7.9M
$-9.8M
Gross Margin
56.1%
10.5%
Operating Margin
-51.1%
-40.0%
Net Margin
-52.5%
-38.2%
Revenue YoY
-38.5%
-31.3%
Net Profit YoY
-512.2%
-216.6%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.76

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$15.1M
$25.6M
Q3 25
$19.0M
$30.7M
Q2 25
$19.5M
$24.8M
Q1 25
$15.4M
$18.0M
Q4 24
$24.6M
$37.2M
Q3 24
$26.2M
$35.4M
Q2 24
$28.0M
$25.9M
Q1 24
$20.2M
$24.3M
Net Profit
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$-7.9M
$-9.8M
Q3 25
$-2.3M
$-9.1M
Q2 25
$-4.9M
$760.0K
Q1 25
$-3.9M
$-9.8M
Q4 24
$-1.3M
$8.4M
Q3 24
$-1.8M
$-12.9M
Q2 24
$-3.6M
$-2.1M
Q1 24
$-5.2M
$-4.3M
Gross Margin
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
56.1%
10.5%
Q3 25
56.1%
11.3%
Q2 25
54.3%
30.3%
Q1 25
61.4%
9.7%
Q4 24
63.4%
54.1%
Q3 24
60.3%
45.0%
Q2 24
60.4%
33.0%
Q1 24
65.1%
24.2%
Operating Margin
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
-51.1%
-40.0%
Q3 25
-10.7%
-30.0%
Q2 25
-23.1%
1.5%
Q1 25
-24.1%
-57.0%
Q4 24
-6.5%
21.0%
Q3 24
-6.6%
3.3%
Q2 24
-11.5%
-9.3%
Q1 24
-26.1%
-18.6%
Net Margin
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
-52.5%
-38.2%
Q3 25
-12.0%
-29.5%
Q2 25
-25.0%
3.1%
Q1 25
-25.4%
-54.4%
Q4 24
-5.3%
22.5%
Q3 24
-6.8%
-36.3%
Q2 24
-13.0%
-8.0%
Q1 24
-25.5%
-17.8%
EPS (diluted)
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$-0.76
Q3 25
$-0.70
Q2 25
$0.06
Q1 25
$-0.77
Q4 24
$0.65
Q3 24
$-0.96
Q2 24
$-0.16
Q1 24
$-0.32

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$4.9M
$10.6M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$0
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$15.2M
$115.9M
Total Assets
$29.6M
$144.6M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.00×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$4.9M
$10.6M
Q3 25
$7.6M
$26.3M
Q2 25
$10.5M
$25.6M
Q1 25
$14.3M
$19.8M
Q4 24
$18.0M
$22.1M
Q3 24
$16.1M
$37.1M
Q2 24
$20.3M
$42.5M
Q1 24
$17.5M
$51.2M
Total Debt
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$0
Q3 25
$0
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
$0
Q3 24
$0
Q2 24
Q1 24
$0
Stockholders' Equity
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$15.2M
$115.9M
Q3 25
$22.6M
$125.5M
Q2 25
$24.3M
$134.3M
Q1 25
$27.0M
$133.1M
Q4 24
$30.0M
$142.7M
Q3 24
$30.6M
$134.6M
Q2 24
$30.9M
$137.4M
Q1 24
$33.0M
$142.2M
Total Assets
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$29.6M
$144.6M
Q3 25
$40.1M
$153.0M
Q2 25
$45.4M
$149.8M
Q1 25
$49.8M
$149.0M
Q4 24
$49.5M
$159.9M
Q3 24
$52.1M
$152.2M
Q2 24
$59.9M
$152.0M
Q1 24
$55.7M
$157.7M
Debt / Equity
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
0.00×
Q3 25
0.00×
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
0.00×
Q3 24
0.00×
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.00×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-1.0M
$-15.1M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-1.0M
$-17.6M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-6.9%
-68.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
9.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-33.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$-1.0M
$-15.1M
Q3 25
$-1.6M
$-4.1M
Q2 25
$-4.4M
$-4.7M
Q1 25
$-3.9M
$-1.9M
Q4 24
$-9.0K
$-11.5M
Q3 24
$-722.0K
$-1.6M
Q2 24
$2.9M
$-1.3M
Q1 24
$-6.0K
$-8.9M
Free Cash Flow
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
$-1.0M
$-17.6M
Q3 25
$-1.6M
$-6.2M
Q2 25
$-4.4M
$-6.1M
Q1 25
$-3.1M
Q4 24
$-14.7M
Q3 24
$-1.8M
Q2 24
$2.9M
$-1.7M
Q1 24
$-42.0K
$-11.3M
FCF Margin
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
-6.9%
-68.6%
Q3 25
-8.4%
-20.3%
Q2 25
-22.7%
-24.7%
Q1 25
-17.3%
Q4 24
-39.5%
Q3 24
-5.2%
Q2 24
10.3%
-6.4%
Q1 24
-0.2%
-46.6%
Capex Intensity
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
0.0%
9.7%
Q3 25
0.2%
6.9%
Q2 25
0.0%
5.7%
Q1 25
0.0%
6.8%
Q4 24
0.0%
8.6%
Q3 24
0.0%
0.8%
Q2 24
0.0%
1.6%
Q1 24
0.2%
9.8%
Cash Conversion
ATER
ATER
GEOS
GEOS
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
-6.22×
Q1 25
Q4 24
-1.37×
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

ATER
ATER

Sales Channel Directly To Consumer$13.1M87%
Heating Cooling And Air Quality$2.1M14%

GEOS
GEOS

Energy Solutions$14.6M57%
Smart Water$5.8M22%
Intelligent Industrial$5.1M20%

Related Comparisons