vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aterian, Inc. (ATER) and NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (NEN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.6M vs $15.1M, roughly 1.6× Aterian, Inc.). Aterian, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -52.5% vs -677.3%, a 624.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.7% vs -38.5%). Over the past eight quarters, NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP's revenue compounded faster (8.9% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Aterian, Inc. is a technology-enabled consumer products company that leverages artificial intelligence and data analytics to identify market demand, develop, source and distribute a wide portfolio of affordable goods spanning home improvement, wellness, personal care, pet supplies and outdoor recreation. It primarily sells its products through leading global e-commerce platforms, with core markets covering North America and Europe.
New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership is a real estate investment entity that owns, operates and manages residential and commercial properties primarily across the U.S. New England region. Its core assets include multifamily apartments, mixed-use properties and small commercial spaces, serving tenants across Massachusetts, New Hampshire and adjacent states, delivering steady returns to unitholders via rental income and property value growth.
ATER vs NEN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.1M | $23.6M |
| Net Profit | $-7.9M | $-1.4M |
| Gross Margin | 56.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -51.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Margin | -52.5% | -677.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -38.5% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -512.2% | -133.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $15.1M | $23.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $23.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.5M | $21.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.4M | $20.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.6M | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.2M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.2M | $19.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-7.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.3M | $-521.8K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.9M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $4.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.8M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.6M | $4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.2M | $3.5M |
| Q4 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 54.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 60.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 60.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 65.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | -51.1% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.7% | 20.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -23.1% | 33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -24.1% | 30.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.6% | 32.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.5% | 32.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -26.1% | 28.9% |
| Q4 25 | -52.5% | -677.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -12.0% | -2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -25.0% | 19.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -25.4% | 18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.3% | 20.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -6.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -25.5% | 17.4% |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $4.9M | $26.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $531.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $15.2M | — |
| Total Assets | $29.6M | $505.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $4.9M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.6M | $13.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.5M | $16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.3M | $30.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.0M | $17.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.1M | $15.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $20.3M | $13.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.5M | $28.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $531.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $514.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $514.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $407.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $408.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $409.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $410.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $410.7M |
| Q4 25 | $15.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $29.6M | $505.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.1M | $492.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $45.4M | $494.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.8M | $385.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.5M | $393.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.1M | $387.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.9M | $383.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.7M | $381.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.0M | $27.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | $27.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | $12.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $5.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-9.0K | $31.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-722.0K | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | $5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.0K | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | $-1.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-42.0K | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -22.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.44× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.17× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATER
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $13.1M | 87% |
| Heating Cooling And Air Quality | $2.1M | 14% |
NEN
Segment breakdown not available.
