vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Athene Holding Ltd. (ATHS) and Edison International (EIX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Athene Holding Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($8.1B vs $5.2B, roughly 1.6× Edison International). Edison International runs the higher net margin — 35.4% vs 6.4%, a 29.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Athene Holding Ltd. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (115.1% vs 30.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Athene Holding Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (19.2% CAGR vs 13.1%).
Athene Holding Ltd. is a leading US-focused retirement services provider. It offers fixed, indexed and variable annuity products plus tailored retirement savings solutions for individual consumers and institutional clients, aiming to help customers secure long-term financial stability for their retirement.
Edison International is a public utility holding company based in Rosemead, California. Its subsidiaries include Southern California Edison, and unregulated non-utility business assets Edison Energy. Edison's roots trace back to Holt & Knupps, a company founded in 1886 as a provider of street lights in Visalia, California.
ATHS vs EIX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.1B | $5.2B |
| Net Profit | $523.0M | $1.8B |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 16.9% | 52.8% |
| Net Margin | 6.4% | 35.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 115.1% | 30.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | -48.5% | 443.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $4.78 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.1B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.0B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $4.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2B | $3.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.5B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.7B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $4.1B |
| Q4 25 | $523.0M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $464.0M | $343.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $465.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $625.0M | $516.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $629.0M | $439.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.2B | $-11.0M |
| Q4 25 | 16.9% | 52.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.2% | 17.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.3% | 56.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.4% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.7% | 19.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 31.1% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 35.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | 37.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.8% | 8.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.6% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.8% | -0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.78 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.89 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $158.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $7.8B | $38.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $20.5B | $17.6B |
| Total Assets | $442.2B | $94.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.38× | 2.16× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $158.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $364.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $193.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $200.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $465.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.3B | $992.0M |
| Q4 25 | $7.8B | $38.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $36.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9B | $37.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.3B | $38.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3B | $35.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7B | $34.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.7B | $34.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.7B | $34.7B |
| Q4 25 | $20.5B | $17.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.4B | $17.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $18.1B | $16.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.4B | $15.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.4B | $15.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.0B | $15.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.8B | $15.2B |
| Q4 25 | $442.2B | $94.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.9B | $90.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $405.3B | $88.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $381.5B | $88.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $363.3B | $85.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $355.0B | $84.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.6B | $84.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $320.6B | $83.6B |
| Q4 25 | 0.38× | 2.16× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.38× | 2.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.43× | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.36× | 2.31× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.39× | 2.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.33× | 2.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.38× | 2.26× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.39× | 2.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $3.0B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-319.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 36.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.82× | 0.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-715.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $636.0M | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $882.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $426.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $386.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $780.0M | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $525.0M | $329.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $185.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | $-319.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $618.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-830.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-184.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-326.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $961.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-236.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -18.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -25.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -5.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 26.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 32.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.4% |
| Q4 25 | 5.82× | 0.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.51× | 2.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.28× | 2.57× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.92× | 0.85× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.38× | 3.44× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.25× | 4.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.83× | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.16× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
ATHS
Segment breakdown not available.
EIX
| Commercial | $2.2B | 43% |
| Residential | $1.2B | 23% |
| Other | $966.0M | 19% |
| Other Operating Revenue | $802.0M | 15% |
