vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Aurora Innovation, Inc. (AUR) and ECARX Holdings Inc. (ECX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ECARX Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($323.3M vs $1.0M, roughly 323.3× Aurora Innovation, Inc.). ECARX Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -21.4% vs -20100.0%, a 20078.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. ECARX Holdings Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-86.5M vs $-157.0M).
Aurora Innovation, Inc., doing business as Aurora, is a self-driving vehicle technology company based in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Aurora has developed the Aurora Driver, a computer system that can be integrated into cars for autonomous driving. It was co-founded by Chris Urmson, the former chief technology officer of Google/Alphabet Inc.'s self-driving team, which became known as Waymo, as well as by Sterling Anderson, former head of Tesla Autopilot, and Drew Bagnell, former head of Uber's a...
ECARX Holdings Inc. is a global mobility technology provider specializing in integrated smart vehicle solutions, including in-vehicle infotainment systems, advanced driver assistance technologies, and connected car cloud services. It primarily partners with automotive manufacturers across the world, with a strong operational presence in the Chinese and European markets.
AUR vs ECX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 2025 vs Q2 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.0M | $323.3M |
| Net Profit | $-201.0M | $-69.1M |
| Gross Margin | -500.0% | 15.5% |
| Operating Margin | -22200.0% | -20.2% |
| Net Margin | -20100.0% | -21.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 6.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 3.4% | 12.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.11 | $-0.20 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | $1.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0M | $323.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0 | $303.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $0 | $33 | ||
| Q1 23 | $0 | $71 | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-201.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-201.0M | $-69.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-208.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-182.0M | $-79.2M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-218.0M | $-8 | ||
| Q1 23 | $-196.0M | $-31 | ||
| Q4 22 | $-294.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-198.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -500.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -400.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 22.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | 29.6% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 27.8% | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | -22200.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -23000.0% | -20.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | -14835.9% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6903.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | -20100.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -20100.0% | -21.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -26.1% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | -23.8% | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -43.3% | ||
| Q4 22 | -13980.0% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -6834.7% | — |
| Q3 25 | $-0.11 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.11 | $-0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.13 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.12 | $-0.23 | ||
| Q2 23 | $-0.18 | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 22 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-0.17 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $87.0M | $86.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.3B | $-293.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $494.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $206.0M | $86.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $108.4M | ||
| Q2 23 | $785.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $966.0M | $106.9M | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $1.2B | — |
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 23 | — | $64 | ||
| Q1 23 | — | — | ||
| Q4 22 | — | — | ||
| Q3 22 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $-293.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $-198.5M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.4B | $-46.4M | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.6B | $-25.7M | ||
| Q4 22 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.0B | — |
| Q3 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $494.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $555.0M | ||
| Q2 23 | $1.7B | $552 | ||
| Q1 23 | $1.9B | $616.3M | ||
| Q4 22 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $2.3B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-149.0M | $-82.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-157.0M | $-86.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -15700.0% | -26.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 800.0% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-645.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | $-149.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-144.0M | $-82.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-143.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-176.0M | $-57.1M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-182.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-136.0M | $-58.8M | ||
| Q4 22 | $-141.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-142.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | $-157.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-151.0M | $-86.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-150.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.0M | $-64.9M | ||
| Q2 23 | $-186.0M | — | ||
| Q1 23 | $-138.0M | $-77.4M | ||
| Q4 22 | $-144.0M | — | ||
| Q3 22 | $-145.0M | — |
| Q3 25 | -15700.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -15100.0% | -26.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -21.4% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | -108701272.8% | ||
| Q4 22 | -6847.4% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | -5005.2% | — |
| Q3 25 | 800.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 700.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 23 | — | — | ||
| Q1 23 | — | 26031874.5% | ||
| Q4 22 | 142.7% | — | ||
| Q3 22 | 103.6% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
