vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Avidia Bancorp, Inc. (AVBC) and MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($40.6M vs $26.8M, roughly 1.5× Avidia Bancorp, Inc.). Avidia Bancorp, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.9% vs -19.9%, a 42.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Avidia Bancorp, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($24.1M vs $-4.8M).
Avidia Bank is an American mutual community bank headquartered in Hudson, Massachusetts. It was founded in 2007 when it was formed by a merger between Hudson Savings Bank and Westborough Bank.
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
AVBC vs MX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $26.8M | $40.6M |
| Net Profit | $5.3M | $-8.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 9.3% |
| Operating Margin | 33.3% | -26.1% |
| Net Margin | 22.9% | -19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -20.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 50.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.8M | $40.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.0M | $45.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.9M | $47.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.9M | $44.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $51.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $55.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $46.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $43.4M |
| Q4 25 | $5.3M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-907.0K | $-13.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9M | $323.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | $-8.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-9.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-13.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-15.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.6% |
| Q4 25 | 33.3% | -26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | -25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.4% | -15.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -72.0% | -14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -8.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -21.6% |
| Q4 25 | 22.9% | -19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.2% | -28.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.0% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -50.5% | -19.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -31.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -35.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.24 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.44 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.34 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.40 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $275.0M | $103.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $379.0M | $248.3M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $351.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $275.0M | $103.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $208.3M | $108.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $592.5M | $113.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $132.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $138.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $151.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $162.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $171.6M |
| Q4 25 | $379.0M | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $372.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $191.4M | $270.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $186.1M | $269.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $276.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $299.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $305.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $321.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | $351.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.8B | $359.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $370.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $373.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $379.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $412.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $426.2M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.4M | $5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $24.1M | $-4.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 89.9% | -11.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.0% | 25.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 5.32× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.2M | $-54.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $28.4M | $5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.1M | $162.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.3M | $-25.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-2.2M | $-4.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $11.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-12.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.0M |
| Q4 25 | $24.1M | $-4.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $23.3M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.3M | $-37.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.9M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-15.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-4.6M |
| Q4 25 | 89.9% | -11.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 83.2% | -16.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.8% | -77.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.9% | -10.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -28.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -10.7% |
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 5.32× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.60× | -77.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AVBC
Segment breakdown not available.
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
