vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp (MX) and Repay Holdings Corp (RPAY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Repay Holdings Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($78.6M vs $40.6M, roughly 1.9× MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp). MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR Corp runs the higher net margin — -19.9% vs -178.3%, a 158.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Repay Holdings Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -20.7%). Repay Holdings Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($23.2M vs $-4.8M). Over the past eight quarters, Repay Holdings Corp's revenue compounded faster (-1.3% CAGR vs -3.4%).
Magnachip Semiconductor Corp is a global semiconductor design and manufacturing firm specializing in high-performance analog and mixed-signal solutions. Its core products include display driver ICs, power management ICs and sensors, serving consumer electronics, automotive, industrial and communications markets worldwide.
Repay Holdings Corp is a leading payment technology provider delivering integrated end-to-end payment processing solutions for businesses across North America. Its offerings include credit/debit card processing, ACH transfer services, POS system integrations and digital payment tools, serving retail, healthcare, automotive and e-commerce segments to help clients streamline transaction workflows and boost operational efficiency.
MX vs RPAY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $40.6M | $78.6M |
| Net Profit | $-8.1M | $-140.1M |
| Gross Margin | 9.3% | 74.2% |
| Operating Margin | -26.1% | -182.2% |
| Net Margin | -19.9% | -178.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -20.7% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 50.4% | -3304.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.23 | $-1.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $40.6M | $78.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.9M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $47.6M | $75.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.7M | $77.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.2M | $78.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $55.4M | $79.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $74.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $43.4M | $80.7M |
| Q4 25 | $-8.1M | $-140.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.1M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $323.0K | $-102.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-8.9M | $-7.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-16.3M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.6M | $3.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-13.0M | $-4.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-15.4M | $-5.2M |
| Q4 25 | 9.3% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.6% | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | 75.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.9% | 75.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.7% | 76.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | 77.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.1% | 78.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.6% | 76.2% |
| Q4 25 | -26.1% | -182.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -25.1% | -3.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -15.6% | -138.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -14.1% | -4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -12.5% | -1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.1% | -0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.3% | -4.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -21.6% | -3.1% |
| Q4 25 | -19.9% | -178.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -28.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | -135.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -31.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.3% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -28.0% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -35.5% | -6.5% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.23 | $-1.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.36 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.01 | $-1.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.24 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.44 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.26 | $0.03 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.34 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.40 | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $103.8M | $115.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $280.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $248.3M | $484.4M |
| Total Assets | $351.5M | $1.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.58× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $103.8M | $115.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $108.0M | $95.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.3M | $162.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $132.7M | $165.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $138.6M | $189.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $168.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $162.5M | $147.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $171.6M | $128.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $280.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $279.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $279.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $497.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $496.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $496.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $435.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $434.9M |
| Q4 25 | $248.3M | $484.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.3M | $616.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $270.2M | $633.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $269.2M | $755.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.8M | $761.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $299.6M | $754.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $305.8M | $815.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.9M | $813.8M |
| Q4 25 | $351.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $359.6M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $370.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $373.9M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $379.3M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $411.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $412.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $426.2M | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.58× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.65× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.53× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.4M | $23.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.8M | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.9% | 29.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 25.3% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-54.2M | $90.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.4M | $23.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $162.0K | $32.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-25.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.7M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.9M | $34.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.9M | $60.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.1M | $31.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.0M | $24.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-4.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $32.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-37.0M | $33.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-4.9M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4M | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-15.5M | $59.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.0M | $30.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.6M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | -11.9% | 29.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.3% | 41.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.7% | 43.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.7% | 43.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -28.0% | 75.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.3% | 40.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -10.7% | 30.6% |
| Q4 25 | 25.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.7% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.9% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.5% | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.5% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -77.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.52× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
MX
| Power Analog Solutions | $36.8M | 91% |
| Power Ic | $3.8M | 9% |
RPAY
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $69.4M | 88% |
| Other | $6.8M | 9% |
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $2.3M | 3% |
