vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. (FVN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($584.4K vs $310.0K, roughly 1.9× Anteris Technologies Global Corp.). Future Vision II Acquisition Corp. runs the higher net margin — 86.8% vs -9420.0%, a 9506.8% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
Future Vision II Acquisition Corp is a special purpose acquisition company formed to pursue mergers, asset acquisitions, or business combinations with high-growth enterprises. It targets technology, consumer, and sustainable industry segments across North American and Asia-Pacific markets to drive long-term shareholder value.
AVR vs FVN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $584.4K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $507.0K |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -14.4% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | 86.8% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | $584.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $618.7K | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $614.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | $612.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $147.8K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | $507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $557.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $551.9K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $454.3K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $141.9K |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | -14.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | -11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | -27.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.5% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | 86.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | 90.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | 89.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | 74.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 96.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $61.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | $1.8M |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $62.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $61.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3M |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $62.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $61.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | $60.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $59.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $-99.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.20× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $-99.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-7.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | $-11.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-190.1K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -0.01× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.42× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.