vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd (JF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($310.0K vs $295.2K, roughly 1.1× Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd). Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd runs the higher net margin — -31.0% vs -9420.0%, a 9389.0% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
Pintec Technology Holdings Ltd is a fintech SaaS provider offering end-to-end digital financial solutions. Its core services include intelligent risk management, digital lending facilitation, and wealth management tools, serving banks, consumer finance firms and e-commerce platforms primarily in the Chinese market.
AVR vs JF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $295.2K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $-91.6K |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | 60.9% |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -47.2% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | -31.0% |
| Revenue YoY | — | — |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $295.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $289.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $-91.6K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-161.6K |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | 60.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 59.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -51.1% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | -31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -55.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $0.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.00 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $653.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | — |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $1.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $653.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $863.7K |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
