vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (AVR) and Nakamoto Inc. (NAKA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Nakamoto Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($444.9K vs $310.0K, roughly 1.4× Anteris Technologies Global Corp.). Nakamoto Inc. runs the higher net margin — 8374.2% vs -9420.0%, a 17794.2% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Anteris Technologies Global Corp is a medical technology firm specializing in innovative structural heart care solutions. It develops and commercializes bioprosthetic heart valves and transcatheter intervention products, serving healthcare providers across North America, Europe, and Asia-Pacific, with core focus on cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology segments.
AVR vs NAKA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $310.0K | $444.9K |
| Net Profit | $-29.2M | $37.3M |
| Gross Margin | 70.6% | — |
| Operating Margin | -9343.5% | -41198.2% |
| Net Margin | -9420.0% | 8374.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -26.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 3820.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.74 | $0.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $310.0K | $444.9K | ||
| Q3 25 | $429.0K | $388.2K | ||
| Q2 25 | $618.0K | $408.5K | ||
| Q1 25 | $556.0K | $579.7K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $603.9K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $647.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $639.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $829.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-29.2M | $37.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-22.2M | $-86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.8M | $-2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.9M | $-1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-282.3K |
| Q4 25 | 70.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 62.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -9343.5% | -41198.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5190.0% | -2680.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3379.3% | -585.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3917.3% | -179.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -169.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -162.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -162.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -28.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9420.0% | 8374.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -5185.1% | -22162.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -3371.2% | -590.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -3932.4% | -179.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -165.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -156.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -206.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -34.1% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.74 | $0.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.62 | $-0.42 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.58 | $-0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.61 | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.26 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.06 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $22.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $22.0K | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-93.0K | $514.3M |
| Total Assets | $23.0M | $730.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.0M | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $287.4K |
| Q4 25 | $22.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0K | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.0K | $64.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $148.8K | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $205.6K | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $254.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $710.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-93.0K | $514.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.7M | $477.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $24.4M | $9.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.3M | $1.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-383.1K |
| Q4 25 | $23.0M | $730.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.1M | $692.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $39.9M | $9.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $58.8M | $2.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $799.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.00× | 0.04× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.06× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-18.5M | $-23.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-18.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -6104.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 128.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-79.8M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-18.5M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.3M | $-13.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-19.5M | $-1.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.5M | $-865.1K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-913.5K | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-213.4K |
| Q4 25 | $-18.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-20.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-21.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-224.6K |
| Q4 25 | -6104.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -4434.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3247.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -3909.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -511.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -161.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -27.1% |
| Q4 25 | 128.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 180.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 86.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
