vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. (AXTA) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($5.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 4.6× SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 1.8%, a 12.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -0.6%). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL produced more free cash flow last quarter ($87.2M vs $21.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.'s revenue compounded faster (94.5% CAGR vs 3.1%).
Axalta Coating Systems Ltd., also known as simply Axalta, is an American company specializing in coatings in a wide variety of industrial applications, materials and sectors, including automotive paints. The company is based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and incorporated in Bermuda. Axalta develops and manufactures coatings for light and commercial vehicles, industrial, and refinish applications. The firm does business in 130 countries, has nearly 13,000 employees, and has more than 100,000 ...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
AXTA vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $91.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 83.6% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 1.8% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.6% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -9.1% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.42 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $91.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $60.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $109.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $99.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $101.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $112.0M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | 83.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 33.4% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 34.9% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 35.0% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 34.3% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.1% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.0% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 34.0% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.9% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.3% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.8% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.4% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.3% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.42 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.28 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.51 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.50 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.45 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.63 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $608.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $3.1B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.5B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $7.6B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.27× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $608.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $657.0M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $606.0M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $625.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $575.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $593.0M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $840.0M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.2B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.4B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $7.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.6B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.8B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.8B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.4B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.3B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | 1.27× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.36× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.48× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.50× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.64× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.84× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.02× | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $21.0M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.4% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $491.0M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $344.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $142.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $26.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $234.0M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $194.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $114.0M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | $21.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $286.0M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $97.0M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.0M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $161.0M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $91.0M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 22.7% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.8% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.3% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.1% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.7% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.6% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.7% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.73× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.25× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.30× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.26× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.71× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.92× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.02× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
AXTA
Segment breakdown not available.
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
