vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.). SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL runs the higher net margin — 14.3% vs 7.1%, a 7.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs -2.4%). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($183.7M vs $87.2M). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs -1.5%).
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is an American manufacturer of home and security products, headquartered in Deerfield, Illinois. Its portfolio of businesses and brands includes Moen and the House of Rohl; outdoor living and security products from Therma-Tru, Larson, Fiberon, Master Lock and SentrySafe; and MasterBrand Cabinets. Fortune Brands is a Fortune 500 company and part of the S&P 400 Index. As of December 31, 2021, the company reported employing approximately 28,000 associates and pos...
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
FBIN vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $76.3M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | 43.8% | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 11.3% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 7.1% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -27.3% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.63 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $76.3M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $70.8M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.3M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.4M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.0M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $136.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $133.9M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $96.4M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.1% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.0% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 46.0% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.9% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 43.9% | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.0% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.4% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.0% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 7.1% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.2% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.3% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.0% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.5% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.8% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.7% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.63 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.59 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.83 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.42 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.84 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.09 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.06 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.76 | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $264.0M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.5B | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.4B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.07× | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $264.0M | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.9M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $234.7M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $340.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $381.1M | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $344.8M | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $352.6M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $359.7M | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7B | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.6B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.7B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8B | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.93× | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.16× | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.10× | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.15× | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.17× | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $208.2M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $183.7M | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 17.0% | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.3% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.73× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $366.8M | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $208.2M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $204.4M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $149.4M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-83.4M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $272.3M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $205.3M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $261.5M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-71.3M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | $183.7M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $177.0M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $118.7M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-112.6M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $212.1M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $175.6M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $222.7M | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-135.9M | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | 17.0% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.9% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -10.9% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.2% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.0% | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.2% | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | 2.3% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.1% | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 2.73× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.89× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.49× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.62× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.59× | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.50× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.95× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.74× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
FBIN
| Wholesale Retail Trade | $526.7M | 49% |
| Home Center Retailer | $257.1M | 24% |
| Security Segment | $165.8M | 15% |
| Other Retailer | $118.2M | 11% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
