vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $633.7M, roughly 1.7× CENTURY ALUMINUM CO). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 56.7% vs 0.3%, a 56.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
BAM vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $615.0M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 84.2% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | 56.7% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $974.0M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $931.0M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $873.0M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.0M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $786.0M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | $615.0M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.0M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $584.0M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.0M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.0M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.0M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 84.2% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.1% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.0% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.5% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.4% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.5% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.5% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.9B | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $17.0B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.0M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.0M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | $17.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $562.0M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.91× | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $529.0M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.0M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $516.0M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.52× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.38× | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAM
| Incentive Fees | $452.0M | 42% |
| Infrastruture | $332.0M | 31% |
| Private Equity | $174.0M | 16% |
| Renewable Power And Transition | $66.0M | 6% |
| Other | $47.0M | 4% |
| Management And Advisory Fees | $14.0M | 1% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |