vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $1.1B, roughly 1.0× Brookfield Asset Management Ltd.). Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. runs the higher net margin — 56.7% vs 14.3%, a 42.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. is a Canadian-American alternative asset manager. The company was founded in December 2022 as a spin-off of the asset management operations of Brookfield Corporation, and manages investments across real estate, infrastructure, renewable energy, private equity, and credit markets globally.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
BAM vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $615.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | 84.2% | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 56.7% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $974.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $931.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $954.0M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $873.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $821.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $786.0M | $1.0B |
| Q4 25 | $615.0M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.0M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $584.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $507.0M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $537.0M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $124.0M | $118.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $373.0M | $131.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 24.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 26.2% |
| Q4 25 | 84.2% | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 79.1% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 70.8% | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 61.0% | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 72.5% | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 80.4% | 21.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 56.5% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | 56.7% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 62.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 61.5% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.1% | 11.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 47.5% | 12.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.6B | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $8.9B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $17.0B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $480.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $332.0M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.0M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $205.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | $8.9B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $17.0B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $16.5B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.1B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.0B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $16.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.90× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $562.0M | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.91× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $562.0M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $745.0M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $529.0M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $265.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $567.0M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.0M | $196.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $516.0M | $220.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $100.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $140.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 13.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.08× | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.91× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.52× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.28× | 1.67× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.38× | 1.68× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BAM
| Incentive Fees | $452.0M | 42% |
| Infrastruture | $332.0M | 31% |
| Private Equity | $174.0M | 16% |
| Renewable Power And Transition | $66.0M | 6% |
| Other | $47.0M | 4% |
| Management And Advisory Fees | $14.0M | 1% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
