vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BRUNSWICK CORP (BC) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Eastman Chemical Company is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.0B vs $1.3B, roughly 1.5× BRUNSWICK CORP). Eastman Chemical Company runs the higher net margin — 5.3% vs 1.4%, a 3.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, BRUNSWICK CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.5% vs -13.8%). Over the past eight quarters, BRUNSWICK CORP's revenue compounded faster (-1.1% CAGR vs -8.6%).
Brunswick Corporation, formerly known as the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company, is an American corporation that has been developing, manufacturing and marketing a wide variety of products since 1845. Brunswick has more than 13,000 employees in 24 countries. Brunswick owns a number of brands, including Mercury Marine. In 2024, Brunswick reported sales of US$5.2 billion. Brunswick's global headquarters is in the northern Chicago suburb of Mettawa, Illinois.
Eastman Chemical Company is an American chemical products manufacturer based in Kingsport, Tennessee. Founded in 1920, it was formerly a subsidiary of Kodak until 1994. The company is an independent global specialty materials company that produces a broad range of advanced materials, chemicals and fibers for everyday purposes. It operates 36 manufacturing sites worldwide and employs approximately 14,000 people. In 2023, Eastman had sales revenue of approximately $9.21 billion.
BC vs EMN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $2.0B |
| Net Profit | $18.7M | $105.0M |
| Gross Margin | 23.1% | 17.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 5.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 15.5% | -13.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 122.7% | -42.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.93 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.4B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $105.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.7M | $105.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-235.5M | $47.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.3M | $140.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.2M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-82.5M | $330.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $44.6M | $180.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $100.0M | $230.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.1% | 17.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 19.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.5% | 22.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.9% | 24.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.9% | 24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.2% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.1% | 25.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 0.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.8% | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 11.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.0% | 12.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -17.3% | 2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.1% | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.5% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.9% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.93 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.32 | $0.93 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.59 | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.89 | $1.20 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.30 | $1.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.21 | $2.81 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.67 | $1.53 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.48 | $1.94 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $256.8M | $566.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.1B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $6.0B |
| Total Assets | $5.3B | $14.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.30× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $566.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $256.8M | $566.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $297.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $315.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $286.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $269.0M | $837.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $284.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $494.5M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $5.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $5.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $5.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $14.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.3B | $14.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.4B | $15.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.8B | $15.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $15.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7B | $15.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.0B | $15.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $14.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.30× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $132.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $83.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 7.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $396.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $132.9M | $502.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $140.4M | $402.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $316.2M | $233.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-27.4M | $-167.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $306.4M | $540.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $67.4M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $211.0M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.6M | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $106.5M | $265.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $271.3M | $83.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-65.1M | $-314.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $276.1M | $361.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.4M | $276.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $163.9M | $252.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.3% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.8% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.9% | 16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.5% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.4% | 10.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 5.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | 6.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 6.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 7.11× | 4.78× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.55× | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.33× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.36× | -0.92× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.51× | 2.20× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.11× | 1.60× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BC
| Engine Partsand Accessories | $532.4M | 40% |
| Navico Group | $452.9M | 34% |
| Recreational Fiberglass Boats | $111.6M | 8% |
| Saltwater Fishing Boats | $85.7M | 6% |
| Controls Riggingand Propellers | $78.3M | 6% |
| Business Acceleration | $48.1M | 4% |
| Sterndrive Engine | $32.6M | 2% |
EMN
Segment breakdown not available.
