vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $751.1M, roughly 1.1× Bloom Energy Corp). Bloom Energy Corp runs the higher net margin — 9.4% vs 0.3%, a 9.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -3.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 6.5%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
BE vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.4% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 396.7% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $659.2M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $30.9M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 46.9% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 6.5% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 4.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $0.88 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $30.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $570.3M |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $36.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $26.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 1.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.17× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
