vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bloom Energy Corp (BE) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bloom Energy Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($751.1M vs $625.1M, roughly 1.2× WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 13.4% vs 9.4%, a 4.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bloom Energy Corp posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (130.4% vs 15.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Bloom Energy Corp's revenue compounded faster (51.7% CAGR vs 4.6%).
KR Sridhar is an Indian American engineer, inventor, professor, and entrepreneur. He is the founder, chairman, and chief executive officer (CEO) of Bloom Energy. Prior, Sridhar was a professor of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering and the Director of the Space Technologies Laboratory (STL) at the University of Arizona. He worked with and advised NASA, and is a member of the National Academy of Engineering.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
BE vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $751.1M | $625.1M |
| Net Profit | $70.7M | $83.7M |
| Gross Margin | 30.0% | 49.5% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 18.2% |
| Net Margin | 9.4% | 13.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 130.4% | 15.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 24.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $2.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $751.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $772.8M | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $513.3M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $396.3M | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $319.3M | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.0M | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $321.8M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $326.5M | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | $70.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4M | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-23.0M | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.2M | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-23.4M | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $105.2M | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-14.6M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-61.2M | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.0% | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.7% | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.0% | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.9% | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.0% | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -3.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.1% | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | 9.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.5% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.6% | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.3% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.5% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.7% | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | $0.44 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $99.91 | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-100.00 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.18 | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.10 | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.45 | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.27 | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $405.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $948.0K | $2.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.1M | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $574.8M | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $794.8M | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $802.9M | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $495.7M | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $581.7M | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $948.0K | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $768.6M | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $653.1M | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $594.6M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $578.3M | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.5M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $430.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $423.3M | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | $4.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.6B | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.7B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.41× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.01× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.66× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $154.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $140.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 22.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.85× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $356.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $418.1M | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.7M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-213.1M | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-110.7M | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $484.2M | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-69.5M | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-175.5M | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $395.1M | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.4M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-220.4M | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-124.9M | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $473.1M | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-83.8M | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-187.5M | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 51.1% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -55.6% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -39.1% | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.4% | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.0% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -57.4% | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.8% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 293.18× | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.60× | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BE
| Product | $653.3M | 87% |
| Service | $61.9M | 8% |
| Installation | $25.9M | 3% |
| Electricity | $9.9M | 1% |
WTS
Segment breakdown not available.
