vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Brookfield Renewable Corp (BEPC) and SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. (SGI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.9B vs $952.0M, roughly 2.0× Brookfield Renewable Corp). SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. runs the higher net margin — 7.5% vs -152.0%, a 159.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SOMNIGROUP INTERNATIONAL INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (54.7% vs -3.7%).
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. is a publicly traded limited partnership that owns and operates renewable power assets, with corporate headquarters in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. It is 60% owned by Brookfield Asset Management.
Somnigroup International Inc. is an American manufacturer of mattresses and bedding products.
BEPC vs SGI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $952.0M | $1.9B |
| Net Profit | $-1.4B | $140.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 44.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 13.2% |
| Net Margin | -152.0% | 7.5% |
| Revenue YoY | -3.7% | 54.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | -326.8% | 95.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.71 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $952.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $989.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | $140.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $177.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.4B | $99.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-33.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $71.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $130.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-339.0M | $106.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $76.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 43.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 44.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 43.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 11.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -152.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -34.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 6.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.47 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.60 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $556.0M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $4.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $10.8B | $3.1B |
| Total Assets | $46.0B | $11.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $556.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $614.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $3.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8B | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $559.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $564.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8B | $411.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $326.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $11.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.0B | $11.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $11.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6B | $4.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.6B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 6.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.95× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 7.74× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $139.0M | $99.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $41.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.71× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $633.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $99.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $408.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0M | $186.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $106.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $129.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $256.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $140.0M | $150.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $130.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $41.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $360.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $149.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $108.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $240.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $122.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $98.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 18.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 8.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.30× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.88× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.80× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.42× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.71× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BEPC
Segment breakdown not available.
SGI
| Mattress Firm Segment | $892.1M | 48% |
| Tempur Sealy North America Segment | $620.5M | 33% |
| Tempur Sealy International Segment | $355.8M | 19% |
