vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and CALERES INC (CAL). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CALERES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($790.1M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.8× B&G Foods, Inc.). CALERES INC runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -4.4%, a 4.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CALERES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.6% vs -4.7%). CALERES INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-12.4M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CALERES INC's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs -12.8%).
B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.
Caleres Inc. is an American footwear company that owns and operates a variety of footwear brands. Its headquarters is located in Clayton, Missouri, a suburb of St. Louis. The company was founded in 1878 as Bryan, Brown & Company in St. Louis, though it underwent several name changes. The Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company was the largest manufacturer of shoes in America in the early 20th century, but it went bankrupt in June 1939.
BGS vs CAL — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $439.3M | $790.1M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 41.8% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Net Margin | -4.4% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 6.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.5% | -94.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $790.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.3M | $658.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.4M | $614.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.4M | $639.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.6M | $740.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $461.1M | $683.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $444.6M | $659.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.2M | $697.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.1M | $6.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.8M | $6.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $835.0K | $4.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-222.4M | $41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $30.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $30.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.2M | $55.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 43.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 45.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 43.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 44.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 45.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 46.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 43.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | 4.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 1.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.3% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.5% | 8.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $0.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $0.21 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.81 | $1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $0.88 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $1.56 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.9M | $34.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.7M | $616.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.30× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $34.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $191.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $33.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $29.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7M | $51.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | $21.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $616.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.7M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.4M | $605.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.8M | $598.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.3M | $606.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $765.0M | $570.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.2M | $560.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.6M | $-1.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-70.7M | $-12.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.1% | -1.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 1.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -0.50× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $54.8M | $14.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.6M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $-5.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | $28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.3M | $-39.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $79.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $36.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $43.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.7M | $35.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $-26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $18.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | $-57.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-679.0K | $68.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $26.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | -0.50× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.05× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.81× | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.17× | 5.82× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.96× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | 2.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.87× | 1.17× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGS
| Specialty Segment | $150.5M | 34% |
| Meals Segment | $110.0M | 25% |
| Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment | $101.4M | 23% |
| Frozen And Vegetables Segment | $77.4M | 18% |
CAL
| Brand Portfolio | $383.7M | 49% |
| Landed Wholesale | $148.1M | 19% |
| Wholesale E Commerce | $75.0M | 9% |
| Ecommerce | $68.8M | 9% |
| Stuart Weitzman Brand | $45.8M | 6% |
| Landed Wholesale Ecommerce Drop Ship | $30.6M | 4% |
| First Cost Wholesale | $14.9M | 2% |
| Clt Brand Solutions | $10.2M | 1% |
| License And Royalty | $2.1M | 0% |
