vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of B&G Foods, Inc. (BGS) and CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $439.3M, roughly 1.4× B&G Foods, Inc.). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -4.4%, a 4.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -4.7%). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO produced more free cash flow last quarter ($67.7M vs $-70.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -12.8%).
B&G Foods, Inc. is an American branded foods holding company based in Parsippany, New Jersey. The company was formed in 1996 to acquire Bloch & Guggenheimer, a Manhattan-based producer of pickles, relish and condiments which had been founded in 1889.
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
BGS vs CENX — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $439.3M | $633.7M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 22.5% | 13.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.5% | 5.2% |
| Net Margin | -4.4% | 0.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -356.5% | -96.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.24 | $0.03 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $633.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $439.3M | $632.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.4M | $628.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $425.4M | $633.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $551.6M | $630.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $461.1M | $539.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $444.6M | $560.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $475.2M | $489.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-19.1M | $14.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-9.8M | $-4.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $835.0K | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-222.4M | $45.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $47.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.9M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-40.2M | $246.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 13.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.5% | 12.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.5% | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | 9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.5% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.2% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.7% | 3.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 22.9% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -46.6% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.1% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | -3.3% | 0.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -4.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.3% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -40.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 8.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.5% | 50.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.24 | $0.15 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.12 | $-0.05 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.01 | $0.29 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.81 | $0.58 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.09 | $0.46 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.05 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.51 | $2.26 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $60.9M | $134.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.0B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $470.7M | $805.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.9B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.30× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $134.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9M | $151.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.1M | $40.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $44.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $50.6M | $32.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $54.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.3M | $41.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $42.5M | $93.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.0B | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $805.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $470.7M | $741.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.4M | $724.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $513.1M | $726.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $524.8M | $694.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $755.3M | $628.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $765.0M | $601.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $781.2M | $601.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.9B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.85× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.75× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.67× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.61× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-64.6M | $102.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-70.7M | $67.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -16.1% | 10.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.4% | 5.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 57.11× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $54.8M | $84.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $102.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-64.6M | $2.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.8M | $7.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $52.7M | $72.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $80.3M | $-41.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.2M | $20.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $11.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.1M | $-14.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $67.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-70.7M | $-18.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.5M | $-15.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.4M | $51.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $71.7M | $-54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-679.0K | $-2.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.5M | $-44.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.1% | -2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 10.0% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.0% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.1% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | -1.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.8% | -9.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 3.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 6.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 57.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.17× | 2.43× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.92× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.56× | 0.42× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.06× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BGS
| Specialty Segment | $150.5M | 34% |
| Meals Segment | $110.0M | 25% |
| Spices And Flavor Solutions Segment | $101.4M | 23% |
| Frozen And Vegetables Segment | $77.4M | 18% |
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
