vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. (BHRB) and Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($143.3M vs $86.5M, roughly 1.7× Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.). Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. runs the higher net margin — 34.9% vs -31.4%, a 66.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (4.9% vs 0.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (81.1% CAGR vs 0.0%).
Burke & Herbert Financial Services Corp is a U.S.-based regional financial holding company, offering personal and commercial banking, wealth management, residential mortgage lending, and small business financing services. Its core market covers Virginia and adjacent Mid-Atlantic regions, serving retail consumers, SMEs, and high-net-worth clients.
Piedmont Realty Trust, Inc. is a publicly traded real estate investment trust (REIT) that owns, operates, and invests in high-quality office properties primarily located in high-growth metropolitan areas across the United States. It serves corporate tenants across multiple industry sectors including technology, professional services, and healthcare, and pursues stable long-term returns for stakeholders via strategic property management and portfolio optimization.
BHRB vs PDM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $86.5M | $143.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.2M | $-45.0M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 43.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 34.9% | -31.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.9% | 0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.8% | -27.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.98 | $-0.10 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $143.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $86.5M | $142.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $139.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $87.1M | $140.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $83.0M | $142.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $82.5M | $143.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.8M | $139.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.3M | $143.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-45.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.2M | $-43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.0M | $-13.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.9M | $-16.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $27.2M | $-10.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $19.8M | $-30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.6M | $-11.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.9M | $-9.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 42.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -27.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | -31.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | -30.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 35.1% | -9.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.3% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.8% | -7.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.0% | -20.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 33.0% | -8.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -24.4% | -6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.98 | $-0.34 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.97 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.97 | $-0.14 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.80 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.72 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.82 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.41 | $-0.08 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $2.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $854.6M | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.9B | $4.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $731.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $109.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $133.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $138.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $854.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $822.2M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $780.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $758.0M | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $730.2M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $738.1M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $693.1M | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.9B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.1B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.8B | $4.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.8B | $4.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $4.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.8B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.34× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $96.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 111.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.5% | 110.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 3.57× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $164.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $140.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.3M | $35.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.0K | $50.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.6M | $3.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.8M | $198.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.8M | $42.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-46.0M | $66.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $96.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $35.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-47.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 111.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 98.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 55.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -67.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 110.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.31× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
