vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Bristol Myers Squibb (BMY) and LITHIA MOTORS INC (LAD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Bristol Myers Squibb is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.5B vs $9.2B, roughly 1.4× LITHIA MOTORS INC). Bristol Myers Squibb runs the higher net margin — 8.7% vs 1.5%, a 7.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Bristol Myers Squibb posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.3% vs 0.3%). Bristol Myers Squibb produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.6B vs $30.5M). Over the past eight quarters, LITHIA MOTORS INC's revenue compounded faster (3.6% CAGR vs 2.6%).
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, doing business as Bristol Myers Squibb, is an American multinational pharmaceutical company headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. The company's primary products are apixaban (Eliquis) for people with atrial fibrillation ; nivolumab (Opdivo), used to treat certain types of cancer ; lenalidomide (Revlimid), used to treat multiple myeloma, smoldering myeloma, and myelodysplastic syndromes ; abatacept (Orencia), used to treat autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid art...
Lithia Motors, Inc. is an American nationwide automotive dealership group headquartered in Medford, Oregon. As of 2025, Lithia is the largest automotive retailer in the United States by revenue, ahead of competitors such as AutoNation and Penske Automotive Group. As of December 31, 2024, Lithia operates 459 dealership locations across the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. The company employs approximately 30,000 people worldwide.
BMY vs LAD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $12.5B | $9.2B |
| Net Profit | $1.1B | $136.9M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 14.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.8% | 3.7% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 1.3% | 0.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 1409.7% | -36.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.54 | $5.90 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $12.5B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.2B | $9.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.3B | $9.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.3B | $9.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.9B | $9.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.2B | $9.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $11.9B | $8.6B |
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $136.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.2B | $217.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $256.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $209.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $216.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $209.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $214.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-11.9B | $162.6M |
| Q4 25 | 67.2% | 14.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 71.9% | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 72.5% | 15.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 72.9% | 15.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.0% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.1% | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.2% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 75.3% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.5% | 4.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.1% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.5% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -97.1% | 4.0% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.9% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.2% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.8% | 2.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -100.4% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.54 | $5.90 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.08 | $8.61 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.64 | $9.87 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.20 | $7.94 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.05 | $8.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $7.80 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.83 | $7.87 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-5.89 | $5.89 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.2B | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $44.8B | $9.7B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $18.5B | $6.6B |
| Total Assets | $90.0B | $25.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 2.43× | 1.47× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7B | $206.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.6B | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.9B | $234.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.9B | $209.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $516.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $9.3B | $264.4M |
| Q4 25 | $44.8B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $49.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $49.4B | $8.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.0B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.4B | — |
| Q4 25 | $18.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $18.6B | $6.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.4B | $7.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $17.4B | $6.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3B | $6.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.1B | $6.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0B | $6.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.5B | $6.4B |
| Q4 25 | $90.0B | $25.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $96.9B | $24.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $94.7B | $24.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $92.4B | $23.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $92.6B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.7B | $23.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $94.6B | $23.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $99.0B | $22.2B |
| Q4 25 | 2.43× | 1.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.81× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.85× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.03× | 1.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.05× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.18× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $2.0B | $123.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.6B | $30.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 12.8% | 0.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.0% | 1.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.82× | 0.90× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $12.8B | $5.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $123.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3B | $-98.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $9.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $322.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.4B | $61.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6B | $219.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $-148.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $292.4M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.0B | $-207.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $-70.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.7B | $253.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $-17.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.3B | $157.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $-278.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.5B | $212.8M |
| Q4 25 | 12.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.0% | -2.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 29.0% | -0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.1% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.9% | -0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 16.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.5% | 2.5% |
| Q4 25 | 3.0% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.7% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | 1.82× | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.87× | -0.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.99× | 0.04× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.80× | 1.54× | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.65× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.62× | 1.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.38× | -0.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.80× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BMY
| Net Product Sales | $12.1B | 97% |
| Zeposia | $159.0M | 1% |
| Opdivo Ovantig | $132.0M | 1% |
| Abecma | $100.0M | 1% |
| Sotyktu | $86.0M | 1% |
LAD
Segment breakdown not available.
