vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) and Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Borr Drilling Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($267.7M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.5× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 13.1%, a 3.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs -1.5%).
Borr Drilling Ltd is a global offshore drilling contractor owning and operating a modern fleet of high-spec jack-up rigs. It offers drilling services to oil and gas exploration and production firms, with main operations across the North Sea, Southeast Asia, Middle East, and West Africa for shallow-water and marginal field projects.
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
BORR vs COCO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $267.7M | $179.8M |
| Net Profit | $35.1M | $30.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.9% |
| Operating Margin | 36.0% | 18.7% |
| Net Margin | 13.1% | 17.0% |
| Revenue YoY | -1.5% | 37.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.7% | 61.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.14 | $0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $179.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $182.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.7M | $168.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $130.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $132.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $271.9M | $144.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.1M | $22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $18.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $19.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $31.7M | $19.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 37.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 36.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 38.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 18.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.0% | 14.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 38.4% | 20.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 4.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.1% | 13.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.7% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.50 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.14 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.32 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.12 | $0.32 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $92.4M | $201.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.0B | $352.2M |
| Total Assets | $3.4B | $488.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $201.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $203.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.4M | $167.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $153.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $156.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $195.3M | $150.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $352.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $331.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $323.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.0B | $296.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $277.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $258.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $252.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $999.2M | $232.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $488.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $461.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $461.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $421.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $384.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $362.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $353.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.2B | $323.0M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.3M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.18× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.3M | $21.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-9.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.0M | $26.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-7.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $35.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $20.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-10.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $8.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $26.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -7.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -0.70× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.18× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.52× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.41× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BORR
| Transferred Over Time | $256.6M | 96% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $11.1M | 4% |
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
