vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of BXP, Inc. (BXP) and SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL (SCI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.1B vs $872.1M, roughly 1.3× BXP, Inc.). BXP, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 15.3% vs 14.3%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (1.7% vs 0.8%). Over the past eight quarters, SERVICE CORP INTERNATIONAL's revenue compounded faster (3.1% CAGR vs 1.3%).
BXP Inc., operating as Boston Properties, is a leading U.S. real estate investment trust focused on owning, managing and developing high-quality Class A commercial office properties across major U.S. metro markets, serving diverse corporate, tech and professional service tenants.
International Distribution Services Limited is a British company providing postal and courier services. IDS was created in 2013 by the UK government as a new holding company of Royal Mail, and a majority of its shares were then sold on the London Stock Exchange, with the government initially retaining a 30 per cent at the time. As of April 2025, IDS is owned and operated by Czech-based EP Group, owned by Daniel Křetínský.
BXP vs SCI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $872.1M | $1.1B |
| Net Profit | $133.0M | $159.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | 28.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 24.8% |
| Net Margin | 15.3% | 14.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | 1.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 53.0% | 5.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.69 | $1.13 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $872.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $877.1M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $871.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $868.5M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $865.2M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $858.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $859.2M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $248.4M | $159.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-121.7M | $117.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $89.0M | $122.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $61.2M | $142.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-228.9M | $151.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $83.6M | $117.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $118.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 58.8% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 59.3% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 59.2% | 27.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.7% | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 59.8% | 24.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 24.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 20.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 21.4% |
| Q1 26 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 28.3% | 14.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.0% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.2% | 11.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.7% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.7% | 11.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.4% | 11.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.69 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.56 | $1.13 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.77 | $0.83 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.56 | $0.86 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.39 | $0.98 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.46 | $1.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.53 | $0.81 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.51 | $0.81 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $512.8M | $243.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $5.1B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $7.7B | $1.6B |
| Total Assets | $25.1B | $18.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.10× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $512.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $243.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $861.1M | $241.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $447.0M | $255.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $398.1M | $227.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $218.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $185.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $685.4M | $184.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $5.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $4.7B |
| Q1 26 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.3B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $25.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $26.2B | $18.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.0B | $18.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.6B | $18.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $25.4B | $17.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1B | $17.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.4B | $17.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $25.5B | $16.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.10× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.17× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.19× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.83× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.92× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.05× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $212.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $87.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 7.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 11.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $554.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $407.8M | $212.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.2M | $252.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $353.1M | $166.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $210.0M | $311.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.7M | $264.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $286.1M | $263.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $367.1M | $196.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $362.7M | $87.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $231.6M | $150.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $281.5M | $83.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.6M | $233.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $312.5M | $151.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $234.5M | $162.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $332.4M | $100.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.6% | 14.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 32.4% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 36.4% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.3% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.1% | 9.7% |
| Q1 26 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.1% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.2% | 7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 6.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.3% | 10.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.0% | 10.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.1% | 9.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.64× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.97× | 1.35× | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.43× | 2.18× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.42× | 2.24× | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.61× | 1.67× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
BXP
| Lease | $818.2M | 94% |
| Parking and other | $30.8M | 4% |
| Development and management services | $9.2M | 1% |
SCI
| Cemetery | $510.9M | 46% |
| Funeral Matured Preneed Revenue | $196.5M | 18% |
| Cemetery Recognized Preneed Merchandise And Service Revenue | $107.4M | 10% |
| Cemetery Atneed Revenue | $104.9M | 9% |
| CA | $56.4M | 5% |
| Funeral Other Revenue | $54.6M | 5% |
| Cemetery Other Revenue | $40.2M | 4% |
| Nonfuneral Home Revenue | $28.1M | 3% |
| Non Funeral Home Preneed Sales Revenue | $22.0M | 2% |
