vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC (CBSH) and Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($475.7M vs $318.2M, roughly 1.5× Mueller Water Products, Inc.). COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC runs the higher net margin — 29.8% vs 13.6%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.1% vs 4.6%). Over the past eight quarters, COMMERCE BANCSHARES INC's revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -5.1%).
Commerce Bancshares, Inc. is a regional bank holding company headquartered in Missouri, with principal offices in Kansas City and St. Louis. It is the corporate parent of Commerce Bank, which offers a diversified line of financial services, including business and personal banking, wealth management and investments through its affiliated companies.
Mueller Water Products, Inc. (MWP) is a publicly traded company headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia. It is one of the largest manufacturers and distributors of fire hydrants, gate valves, and other water infrastructure products in North America. MWP is made up of two business units—Mueller Co. and Mueller Technologies—that oversee more than a dozen brands and affiliates, including Echologics and Mueller Systems.
CBSH vs MWA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $475.7M | $318.2M |
| Net Profit | $141.6M | $43.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 37.6% |
| Operating Margin | — | 17.8% |
| Net Margin | 29.8% | 13.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 4.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.5% | 22.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.96 | $0.27 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $475.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $449.4M | $318.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $441.0M | $380.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $445.8M | $380.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $428.1M | $364.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $422.1M | $304.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $421.4M | $348.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $414.5M | $356.7M |
| Q1 26 | $141.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.7M | $43.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $141.5M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $152.5M | $52.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $131.6M | $51.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $136.1M | $35.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $138.0M | $10.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $139.6M | $47.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 37.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 36.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 38.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 35.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 33.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 31.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 36.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 40.8% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.9% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.0% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 39.2% | 19.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.4% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.4% | 18.8% |
| Q1 26 | 29.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 31.3% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.1% | 13.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.2% | 13.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | 14.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.2% | 11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 32.8% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.7% | 13.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.96 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.86 | $0.27 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.06 | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $0.33 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.98 | $0.33 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.83 | $0.22 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.01 | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.03 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $4.3B | $1.0B |
| Total Assets | $35.7B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $4.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.8B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $981.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $929.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $873.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.3B | $834.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.4B | $810.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $791.6M |
| Q1 26 | $35.7B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $32.9B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.3B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.4B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.5B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6B | $1.6B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $61.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $44.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 13.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 5.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.42× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $173.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $645.1M | $61.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $129.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.2M | $67.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $138.6M | $14.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $577.9M | $54.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $431.7M | $89.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $147.4M | $87.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $592.4M | $44.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $113.3M | $69.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $100.5M | $55.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $126.0M | $5.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $531.7M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $419.1M | $69.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.9M | $75.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 131.8% | 13.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.7% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 22.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.4% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 126.0% | 13.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 99.5% | 20.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 33.5% | 21.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 5.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.9% | 2.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.9% | 3.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.0% | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.1% | 3.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.59× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.73× | 1.28× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.05× | 0.28× | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.25× | 1.53× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.13× | 8.93× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.06× | 1.85× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CBSH
Segment breakdown not available.
MWA
| Water Flow Solutions | $173.0M | 54% |
| Water Management Solutions | $145.2M | 46% |
