vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COASTAL FINANCIAL CORP (CCB) and Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. (HPP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($256.0M vs $138.0M, roughly 1.9× COASTAL FINANCIAL CORP). On growth, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.1% vs -5.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (9.4% CAGR vs -3.6%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
Hudson Pacific Properties is a real estate investment trust with 15.8 million square feet of office buildings, 1.5 million square feet of sound stages, and undeveloped rights for 3 million square feet of additional commercial property. Its properties are on the West Coast of the United States and Vancouver. It is organized in Maryland and headquartered in Los Angeles. It is the largest independent operator of sound stages in Los Angeles.
CCB vs HPP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $138.0M | $256.0M |
| Net Profit | — | $-280.2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | -109.8% |
| Net Margin | — | -109.4% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 22.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -61.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.84 | $-11.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.7M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.4M | $190.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.5M | $198.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.5M | $209.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $200.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $218.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.4M | $214.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-280.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $-144.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $-87.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $-80.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-173.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | $-107.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $-47.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $-53.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 42.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 48.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 48.6% |
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | -109.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | -77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | -46.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -40.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | -83.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -52.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | -21.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -109.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -77.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -46.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -40.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -82.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -53.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | -21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.84 | $-11.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.88 | $-0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.63 | $-0.53 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.95 | $-1.19 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.69 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $-0.33 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.50 | $-0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $138.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.0M | $3.0B |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $7.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $138.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $190.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $236.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $86.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $63.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $114.3M |
| Q4 25 | $491.0M | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.3M | $3.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $461.7M | $3.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.9M | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $438.7M | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.9M | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.7M | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.7M | $3.2B |
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $7.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $8.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $8.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $8.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $8.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $8.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $8.3B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $254.6M | $121.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $246.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 178.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $436.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $254.6M | $121.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | $33.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.0M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $30.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.8M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.6M | $63.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.1M | $35.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $65.1M |
| Q4 25 | $246.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 178.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 170.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.22× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCB
| Other | $74.7M | 54% |
| Baa S Credit Enhancements | $47.3M | 34% |
| Baa S Program Income | $8.4M | 6% |
| Transaction Fees | $4.9M | 4% |
| Servicing And Other Baa S Fees | $1.6M | 1% |
| Baa S Fraud Enhancements | $1.1M | 1% |
HPP
| Core Office | $217.1M | 85% |
| Studio Segment | $21.8M | 9% |
| Ancillary Revenue | $20.2M | 8% |
| Chargebacks | $3.3M | 1% |
