vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of COASTAL FINANCIAL CORP (CCB) and Ranpak Holdings Corp. (PACK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
COASTAL FINANCIAL CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($138.0M vs $93.7M, roughly 1.5× Ranpak Holdings Corp.). On growth, Ranpak Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.3% vs -5.8%). Over the past eight quarters, Ranpak Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (13.7% CAGR vs -3.6%).
Fidelity National Financial, Inc., is an American provider of title insurance and settlement services to the real estate and mortgage industries. A Fortune 500 company, Fidelity National Financial generated approximately $8.469 billion in annual revenue in 2019 from its title and real estate-related operations. The company was the first instance of an attorney licensed by a Native American Tribe being certified as "authorized house counsel" in the state of Florida.
Ranpak Holdings Corp. manufactures machines and paper products used in protective paper-based packing for shipping goods and merchandise for e-commerce and industry, along with automation solutions. The company is based in Concord, Ohio, and has production facilities and offices in Reno, Nevada; Kansas City, Missouri; the Netherlands; Czech Republic; Shanghai and Singapore. The paper packaging material can be used for multiple applications like wrapping, cushioning, void fill and cold chain p...
CCB vs PACK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $138.0M | $93.7M |
| Net Profit | — | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 12.4% | -1.0% |
| Net Margin | — | — |
| Revenue YoY | -5.8% | 2.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.84 | $-0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $138.0M | $93.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $144.7M | $83.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $119.4M | $77.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $139.5M | $77.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.5M | $91.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.1M | $78.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $135.3M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $148.4M | $72.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.6M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | $-7.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.7M | $-10.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.5M | $-8.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.6M | $5.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $-8.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 39.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 45.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 43.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 44.6% |
| Q4 25 | 12.4% | -1.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.4% | -6.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | -12.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.4% | -10.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.8% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.1% | -7.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.9% | -6.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.4% | -12.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 9.2% | -9.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.0% | -14.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.9% | -10.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.6% | -11.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.84 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.88 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.71 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.63 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.95 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.97 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.84 | $0.07 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.50 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $63.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $401.9M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.0M | $534.9M |
| Total Assets | $4.7B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.75× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $63.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $49.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $49.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $65.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $69.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $65.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $55.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $401.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $405.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $406.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $403.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $396.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $396.7M |
| Q4 25 | $491.0M | $534.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $475.3M | $537.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $461.7M | $539.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $449.9M | $544.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $438.7M | $548.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $331.9M | $564.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $316.7M | $566.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $303.7M | $560.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.7B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.6B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $1.1B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.74× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.71× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.70× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.71× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $254.6M | $19.5M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $246.1M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 178.3% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.1% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $436.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $254.6M | $19.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $66.0M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $259.8M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $62.6M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.1M | $19.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $56.8M | $5.2M |
| Q4 25 | $246.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $57.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $68.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $249.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $60.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $55.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | 178.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 39.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 49.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 170.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 39.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 51.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.1% | — |
| Q4 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.34× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.99× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.37× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.65× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.22× | 3.56× | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.35× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCB
| Other | $74.7M | 54% |
| Baa S Credit Enhancements | $47.3M | 34% |
| Baa S Program Income | $8.4M | 6% |
| Transaction Fees | $4.9M | 4% |
| Servicing And Other Baa S Fees | $1.6M | 1% |
| Baa S Fraud Enhancements | $1.1M | 1% |
PACK
| Other | $47.9M | 51% |
| Europe And Asia Segment | $45.8M | 49% |
