vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC (CCRN) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CROSS COUNTRY HEALTHCARE INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($236.8M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.4× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -35.0%, a 60.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -23.6%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $16.1M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -21.0%).
GE Healthcare Technologies, Inc. is an American health technology company based in Chicago, Illinois. The company, which stylizes its own name as GE HealthCare, operates four divisions: Medical imaging, which includes molecular imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance, women’s health screening and X-ray systems; Ultrasound; Patient Care Solutions, which is focused on remote patient monitoring, anesthesia and respiratory care, diagnostic cardiology, and infant care; and Pharmaceutical ...
National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.
CCRN vs PRK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $236.8M | $168.3M |
| Net Profit | $-82.9M | $42.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -30.2% | — |
| Net Margin | -35.0% | 25.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -23.6% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -2109.7% | 10.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-2.56 | $2.62 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $236.8M | $168.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $250.1M | $169.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $274.1M | $168.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $293.4M | $157.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $309.9M | $164.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $315.1M | $170.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.8M | $157.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $379.2M | $152.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-82.9M | $42.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $48.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-490.0K | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.8M | $38.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.6M | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-16.1M | $39.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.7M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | -30.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.1% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | 32.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.9% | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 27.8% |
| Q4 25 | -35.0% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.9% | 27.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.4% | 28.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.2% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.2% | 23.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.8% | 22.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -4.7% | 25.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.7% | 23.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-2.56 | $2.62 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.15 | $2.92 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.20 | $2.97 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.02 | $2.60 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.13 | $2.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.08 | $2.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.47 | $2.42 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.08 | $2.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $108.7M | $233.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $322.8M | $1.4B |
| Total Assets | $449.0M | $9.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $108.7M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $99.1M | $218.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2M | $193.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $80.7M | $237.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.6M | $160.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | $201.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.6M | $261.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.2M | $306.1M |
| Q4 25 | $322.8M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $408.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $412.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $418.2M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $419.0M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $424.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $433.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $462.4M | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $449.0M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $538.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $553.8M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $576.2M | $9.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $589.3M | $9.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.4M | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $602.9M | $9.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $648.4M | $9.9B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $18.2M | $198.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $16.1M | $191.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 6.8% | 114.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 3.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.65× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $40.1M | $328.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.2M | $198.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $20.1M | $52.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $49.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.7M | $37.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $24.2M | $178.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.5M | $43.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $82.4M | $50.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.0M | $35.0M |
| Q4 25 | $16.1M | $191.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.9M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8M | $36.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.7M | $169.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.3M | $41.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.6M | $49.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $31.9M |
| Q4 25 | 6.8% | 114.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 30.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.8% | 28.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.3% | 23.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.0% | 103.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.0% | 24.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 31.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.0% | 20.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.9% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.8% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 2.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.65× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.11× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.03× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 4.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.92× | 1.14× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.23× | 0.99× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CCRN
| Temporary Staffing Services | $189.6M | 80% |
| Physician Staffing | $42.5M | 18% |
| Other Services | $4.7M | 2% |
PRK
Segment breakdown not available.
