vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) and WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC (WWW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($721.6M vs $517.5M, roughly 1.4× WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC runs the higher net margin — 6.1% vs 3.4%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Celsius Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (117.2% vs 25.5%). WOLVERINE WORLD WIDE INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($145.6M vs $-130.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Celsius Holdings, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.4% CAGR vs 14.5%).
Celsius Holdings, Inc. is an American company that produces a range of fitness and energy drinks under the brand name Celsius. The company's products are marketed as healthy, to which the CEO attributes the brand's success.
Wolverine World Wide is a global designer, manufacturer and marketer of branded footwear, apparel and accessories. It owns popular brands including Merrell, Sperry, Saucony and Hush Puppies, serving outdoor, casual, workwear and athletic segments via e-commerce, retail stores and global wholesale networks.
CELH vs WWW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $721.6M | $517.5M |
| Net Profit | $24.7M | $31.8M |
| Gross Margin | 47.4% | 47.3% |
| Operating Margin | 3.6% | 9.7% |
| Net Margin | 3.4% | 6.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 117.2% | 25.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 231.1% | 162.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.04 | $0.37 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $517.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $721.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $725.1M | $470.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $739.3M | $474.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $329.3M | $412.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $332.2M | $494.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $265.7M | $440.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $402.0M | $425.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $24.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-61.0M | $25.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $99.9M | $26.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.4M | $12.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-18.9M | $23.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.4M | $23.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $79.8M | $13.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 47.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 51.3% | 47.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 51.5% | 47.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 52.3% | 47.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.2% | 43.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.0% | 45.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.0% | 43.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 9.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.3% | 8.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.6% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | 7.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.4% | 6.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -8.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.5% | 5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.5% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.7% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 3.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.37 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.04 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.27 | $0.30 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.33 | $0.32 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.15 | $0.15 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.10 | $0.29 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.00 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.28 | $0.17 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $398.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $676.9M | $621.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.2B | $408.0M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $1.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.57× | 1.52× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $398.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $806.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $977.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $890.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $903.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $903.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $621.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $676.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $870.5M | $676.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $871.9M | $708.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $710.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $648.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $702.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $814.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $408.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $376.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.3B | $344.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $443.1M | $310.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $399.9M | $312.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $423.6M | $295.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $415.8M | $262.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.52× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.57× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.72× | 1.80× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.69× | 2.06× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.38× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-119.4M | $146.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-130.0M | $145.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -18.0% | 28.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -4.83× | 4.60× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $323.4M | $125.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $146.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-119.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $331.8M | $33.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.7M | $44.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.4M | $-83.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $75.7M | $82.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.9M | $108.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $26.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | $145.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-130.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $321.5M | $30.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | $41.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $96.4M | $-91.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $70.3M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $104.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.4M | $23.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 28.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | -18.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 44.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 4.8% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.3% | -22.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.2% | 15.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | 23.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 7.6% | 5.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.1% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 1.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.3% | 0.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 4.60× | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.83× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.44× | 1.66× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.33× | -6.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.57× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.03× | 4.66× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.50× | 1.93× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CELH
Segment breakdown not available.
WWW
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $230.2M | 44% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $142.6M | 28% |
| Work Group | $134.0M | 26% |
| Other | $10.7M | 2% |
