vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CENTURY ALUMINUM CO (CENX) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CENTURY ALUMINUM CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($633.7M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.9× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). CENTURY ALUMINUM CO runs the higher net margin — 0.3% vs -18.0%, a 18.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.4% vs -76.3%). WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($168.0M vs $67.7M). Over the past eight quarters, CENTURY ALUMINUM CO's revenue compounded faster (13.8% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Century Aluminum Company is a US-based producer of primary aluminum, with aluminum plants in Kentucky, South Carolina and Iceland. It is the largest producer of primary aluminum in the United States. The company is a publicly held corporation listed on the NASDAQ. The headquarters is at One South Wacker in Chicago.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
CENX vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $633.7M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $1.8M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 13.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.2% | — |
| Net Margin | 0.3% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.4% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | -96.0% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.03 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $633.7M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.2M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $628.1M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $630.9M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $539.1M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $560.8M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.8M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.9M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.6M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $45.2M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $47.3M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.5M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 12.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.6% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.2% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.3% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.3% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.8% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.8% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.1% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.3% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.4% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.7% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 4.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.2% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.4% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.03 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.15 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.29 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.58 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.46 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.03 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $134.2M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $805.6M | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $134.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $151.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.7M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.9M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.9M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $805.6M | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $741.8M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $724.4M | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $726.3M | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $694.4M | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $628.5M | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.5M | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.0B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $102.8M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $67.7M | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 10.7% | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 57.11× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $84.8M | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $102.8M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $72.3M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-41.4M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.5M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $67.7M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.1M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-15.9M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $51.1M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-54.6M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.4M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.4M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 10.7% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.5% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -8.7% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.4% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.0% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.5% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.3% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.1% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.0% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.11× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.13× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.43× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.92× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.42× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CENX
| Aluminum | $566.3M | 89% |
| Alumina | $67.4M | 11% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
