vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp (CHMI) and Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Laird Superfood, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.3M vs $11.8M, roughly 1.1× Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp). On growth, Laird Superfood, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (15.0% vs -37.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Laird Superfood, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (16.1% CAGR vs -15.2%).
Cherry Hill Mortgage Investment Corp is a U.S.-headquartered real estate finance firm focused on acquiring, investing in and managing residential mortgage-related assets. Its core holdings include agency mortgage-backed securities, residential loans and mortgage servicing rights, operating primarily in the U.S. domestic housing finance market.
Laird Superfood, Inc. develops, manufactures and sells a portfolio of plant-based functional superfood products, including premium coffee creamers, hydration blends, nutritional supplements, and plant-powered snacks. It serves health-conscious consumers through direct-to-consumer e-commerce platforms and offline retail partners, mainly operating in the North American market with a focus on sustainably sourced clean ingredients.
CHMI vs LSF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.8M | $13.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $-1.8M |
| Gross Margin | 78.9% | 34.1% |
| Operating Margin | 72.1% | -13.5% |
| Net Margin | — | -13.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -37.2% | 15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -341.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.18 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $11.8M | $13.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $8.6M | $12.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0M | $12.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-3.0M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.7M | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.1M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.6M | $10.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.3M | $9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.5M | $-975.1K | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6M | $-362.2K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.0M | $-156.2K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-398.4K | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.4M | $-166.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $784.0K | $-239.1K | ||
| Q1 24 | $12.1M | $-1.0M |
| Q4 25 | 78.9% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 73.2% | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.7% | 39.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 183.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 83.3% | 38.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 145.3% | 43.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | 41.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 83.9% | 40.0% |
| Q4 25 | 72.1% | -13.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.0% | -7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.4% | -3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 223.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 76.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 171.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | -3.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 78.0% | -11.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.7% | -7.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 25.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 229.2% | -1.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 175.8% | -1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.9% | -2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 73.7% | -10.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.18 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.05 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.03 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.29 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.30 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.49 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $54.9M | $5.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $146.3M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $236.0M | $11.5M |
| Total Assets | $1.5B | $19.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.62× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.9M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $55.4M | $5.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $47.3M | $7.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.3M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.2M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.4M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $47.5M | $7.1M |
| Q4 25 | $146.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $148.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $150.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $152.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $151.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $160.5M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $167.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $236.0M | $11.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.1M | $12.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $229.9M | $13.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $226.6M | $13.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $230.3M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $236.7M | $13.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $234.5M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $247.0M | $12.7M |
| Q4 25 | $1.5B | $19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $18.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $20.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.4B | $21.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | $19.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.6B | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.62× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.65× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.66× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.68× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.68× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $19.1M | $68.4K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $19.1M | $68.4K | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.4M | $1.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $12.5M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $682.0K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.7M | $339.2K | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $305.8K | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.1M | $642.7K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-19.1M | $-422.3K |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.53× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.98× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.18× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -1.58× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CHMI
Segment breakdown not available.
LSF
| Wholesale | $7.0M | 52% |
| Coffee Tea And Hot Chocolate Products | $4.4M | 33% |
| Hydration And Beverage Enhancing Supplements | $1.6M | 12% |
| Other | $352.6K | 3% |
