vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Cellectis S.A. (CLLS) and Village Farms International, Inc. (VFF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Village Farms International, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($12.2M vs $9.5M, roughly 1.3× Cellectis S.A.). Village Farms International, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs -265.9%, a 285.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Cellectis S.A. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (375.0% vs 31.5%).
Cellectis is a French biopharmaceutical company. It develops genome-edited chimeric antigen receptor T-cell technologies for cancer immunotherapy. It has offices in Paris, New York City, and Raleigh, North Carolina.
Grafton Village Cheese Company is a cheesemaker in the town of Grafton in the U.S. state of Vermont. The company produces hand-crafted aged cheddar cheese.
CLLS vs VFF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2024 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.5M | $12.2M |
| Net Profit | $-25.3M | $2.4M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -181.1% | — |
| Net Margin | -265.9% | 19.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 375.0% | 31.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | -51.9% | 128.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.28 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $66.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $77.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $54.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $9.5M | $53.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $78.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-48.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-820.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.3M | $-23.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-25.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 47.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 37.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 23.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -181.1% | -43.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -265.9% | -43.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.7% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 52.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.28 | $-0.21 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.03 | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-0.24 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $149.0M | $81.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $33.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $148.6M | $299.9M |
| Total Assets | $407.1M | $423.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $81.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $82.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $60.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $28.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $149.0M | $29.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $30.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $34.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $39.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $43.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $44.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $46.1M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $48.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | $299.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $295.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $284.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $248.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $274.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $148.6M | $275.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $296.2M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $299.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $423.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $418.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $403.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $377.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $417.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $407.1M | $425.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $458.4M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $464.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 0.16× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $28.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $27.6M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 290.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 13.2% | 90.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-50.0K | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $27.6M | $4.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.9M | ||
| Q4 23 | — | $-2.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -11.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 290.5% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | 4.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 90.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 23 | — | -1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.39× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — | ||
| Q4 23 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLLS
Segment breakdown not available.
VFF
| International Sales | $8.7M | 71% |
| Cannabis United States Segment | $3.4M | 27% |
