vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Clearwater Paper Corp (CLW) and OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Clearwater Paper Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($360.3M vs $307.3M, roughly 1.2× OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC). Clearwater Paper Corp runs the higher net margin — -3.6% vs -20.7%, a 17.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-0.2% vs -4.7%). Over the past eight quarters, Clearwater Paper Corp's revenue compounded faster (2.3% CAGR vs -3.0%).
Clearwater Paper Corporation is an American pulp and paperboard manufacturer. The company was created on December 9, 2008, via a spin-off from Potlatch Corporation and is headquartered in Spokane, Washington.
Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.
CLW vs OXM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $360.3M | $307.3M |
| Net Profit | $-12.8M | $-63.7M |
| Gross Margin | -0.2% | 60.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -27.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.6% | -20.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.7% | -0.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -103.2% | -1517.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-4.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $360.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $386.4M | $307.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.0M | $403.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $391.8M | $392.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $378.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $387.1M | $308.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $393.3M | $419.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $344.4M | $398.2M |
| Q1 26 | $-12.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $38.3M | $-63.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-53.3M | $16.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.7M | $26.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.1M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.8M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.8M | $38.4M |
| Q1 26 | -0.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.5% | 60.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 61.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.0% | 64.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.8% | 63.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.7% | 63.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.6% | 64.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.9% | -27.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.9% | 6.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.5% | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -4.0% | -2.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.3% | 12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.6% | 13.2% |
| Q1 26 | -3.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.9% | -20.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -13.4% | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.7% | 6.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | -1.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.5% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.5% | 9.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.36 | $-4.28 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.30 | $1.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.17 | $1.70 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.38 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $11.87 | $-0.25 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.35 | $2.57 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.55 | $2.42 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $36.5M | $8.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $361.1M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $813.8M | $528.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.6B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.44× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $36.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $30.7M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.4M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.7M | $8.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $44.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $79.6M | $7.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.5M | $18.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.6M | $7.7M |
| Q1 26 | $361.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $346.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $337.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $330.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $283.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | — |
| Q1 26 | $813.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $825.3M | $528.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $783.0M | $597.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $836.8M | $592.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $836.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $854.6M | $612.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $664.6M | $621.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $658.6M | $592.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.5B | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | 0.44× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.43× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.39× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.73× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.74× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-9.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-47.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -15.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 12.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-79.9M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.0M | $-9.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $34.0M | $83.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.2M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-35.1M | $-18.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $16.2M | $88.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.1M | $32.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | $-47.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.7M | $52.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-51.1M | $-27.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-31.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-68.1M | $-56.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.8M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.0M | $21.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -2.6% | -15.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.9% | 13.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.0% | -7.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -8.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.6% | -18.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.9% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.6% | 7.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 6.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 8.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 12.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 3.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.13× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 5.00× | ||
| Q2 25 | -10.44× | -0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.79× | 2.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CLW
Segment breakdown not available.
OXM
| Sales Channel Retail | $162.9M | 53% |
| Sales Channel Wholesale | $61.3M | 20% |
| Johnny Was | $45.4M | 15% |
| Sales Channel Food And Beverage | $29.3M | 10% |
| Other Foreign Countries | $9.0M | 3% |
