vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC (OXM) and PARK NATIONAL CORP (PRK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

OXFORD INDUSTRIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($307.3M vs $168.3M, roughly 1.8× PARK NATIONAL CORP). PARK NATIONAL CORP runs the higher net margin — 25.3% vs -20.7%, a 46.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, PARK NATIONAL CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.2% vs -0.2%). PARK NATIONAL CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($191.9M vs $-47.9M). Over the past eight quarters, PARK NATIONAL CORP's revenue compounded faster (4.9% CAGR vs -3.0%).

Oxford Industries, Inc. is a publicly traded clothing company in the United States that specializes in high-end clothing and apparel. The company carries many major labels, including Tommy Bahama, Lilly Pulitzer, Johnny Was and Southern Tide.

National Retail Systems, Inc. (NRS) includes Keystone Freight Corp. & National Retail Transportation, Inc. (NRT). NRS is an asset based 3PL founded in 1952. It is headquartered in Lyndhurst, New Jersey, United States.

OXM vs PRK — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
OXM
OXM
1.8× larger
OXM
$307.3M
$168.3M
PRK
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
PRK
PRK
+2.4% gap
PRK
2.2%
-0.2%
OXM
Higher net margin
PRK
PRK
46.1% more per $
PRK
25.3%
-20.7%
OXM
More free cash flow
PRK
PRK
$239.9M more FCF
PRK
$191.9M
$-47.9M
OXM
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
PRK
PRK
Annualised
PRK
4.9%
-3.0%
OXM

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Revenue
$307.3M
$168.3M
Net Profit
$-63.7M
$42.6M
Gross Margin
60.3%
Operating Margin
-27.7%
Net Margin
-20.7%
25.3%
Revenue YoY
-0.2%
2.2%
Net Profit YoY
-1517.6%
10.4%
EPS (diluted)
$-4.28
$2.62

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$307.3M
$168.3M
Q3 25
$403.1M
$169.5M
Q2 25
$392.9M
$168.7M
Q1 25
$157.9M
Q4 24
$308.0M
$164.7M
Q3 24
$419.9M
$170.3M
Q2 24
$398.2M
$157.7M
Q1 24
$404.4M
$152.8M
Net Profit
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-63.7M
$42.6M
Q3 25
$16.7M
$47.2M
Q2 25
$26.2M
$48.1M
Q1 25
$42.2M
Q4 24
$-3.9M
$38.6M
Q3 24
$40.6M
$38.2M
Q2 24
$38.4M
$39.4M
Q1 24
$-60.1M
$35.2M
Gross Margin
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
60.3%
Q3 25
61.4%
Q2 25
64.2%
Q1 25
Q4 24
63.1%
Q3 24
63.1%
Q2 24
64.9%
Q1 24
60.9%
Operating Margin
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
-27.7%
Q3 25
6.3%
34.3%
Q2 25
9.2%
35.2%
Q1 25
32.4%
Q4 24
-2.0%
Q3 24
12.5%
27.4%
Q2 24
13.2%
30.6%
Q1 24
-20.1%
27.8%
Net Margin
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
-20.7%
25.3%
Q3 25
4.1%
27.8%
Q2 25
6.7%
28.5%
Q1 25
26.7%
Q4 24
-1.3%
23.5%
Q3 24
9.7%
22.4%
Q2 24
9.6%
25.0%
Q1 24
-14.9%
23.0%
EPS (diluted)
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-4.28
$2.62
Q3 25
$1.12
$2.92
Q2 25
$1.70
$2.97
Q1 25
$2.60
Q4 24
$-0.25
$2.38
Q3 24
$2.57
$2.35
Q2 24
$2.42
$2.42
Q1 24
$-3.72
$2.17

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$8.0M
$233.5M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$528.0M
$1.4B
Total Assets
$1.3B
$9.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$8.0M
$233.5M
Q3 25
$6.9M
$218.9M
Q2 25
$8.2M
$193.1M
Q1 25
$237.6M
Q4 24
$7.0M
$160.6M
Q3 24
$18.4M
$201.7M
Q2 24
$7.7M
$261.5M
Q1 24
$7.6M
$306.1M
Total Debt
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
$29.0M
Stockholders' Equity
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$528.0M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$597.1M
$1.3B
Q2 25
$592.4M
$1.3B
Q1 25
$1.3B
Q4 24
$612.2M
$1.2B
Q3 24
$621.6M
$1.2B
Q2 24
$592.9M
$1.2B
Q1 24
$560.9M
$1.2B
Total Assets
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$1.3B
$9.8B
Q3 25
$1.3B
$9.9B
Q2 25
$1.3B
$9.9B
Q1 25
$9.9B
Q4 24
$1.2B
$9.8B
Q3 24
$1.2B
$9.9B
Q2 24
$1.2B
$9.9B
Q1 24
$1.1B
$9.9B
Debt / Equity
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
Q4 24
Q3 24
Q2 24
Q1 24
0.05×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-9.1M
$198.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-47.9M
$191.9M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-15.6%
114.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
12.6%
3.8%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
4.65×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$-79.9M
$328.2M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-9.1M
$198.3M
Q3 25
$83.5M
$52.6M
Q2 25
$-3.9M
$49.7M
Q1 25
$37.9M
Q4 24
$-18.2M
$178.8M
Q3 24
$88.8M
$43.8M
Q2 24
$32.9M
$50.9M
Q1 24
$74.9M
$35.0M
Free Cash Flow
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
$-47.9M
$191.9M
Q3 25
$52.3M
$51.1M
Q2 25
$-27.4M
$48.4M
Q1 25
$36.8M
Q4 24
$-56.9M
$169.7M
Q3 24
$47.2M
$41.7M
Q2 24
$21.0M
$49.0M
Q1 24
$55.3M
$31.9M
FCF Margin
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
-15.6%
114.1%
Q3 25
13.0%
30.1%
Q2 25
-7.0%
28.7%
Q1 25
23.3%
Q4 24
-18.5%
103.0%
Q3 24
11.2%
24.5%
Q2 24
5.3%
31.1%
Q1 24
13.7%
20.8%
Capex Intensity
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
12.6%
3.8%
Q3 25
7.7%
0.9%
Q2 25
6.0%
0.8%
Q1 25
0.7%
Q4 24
12.6%
5.6%
Q3 24
9.9%
1.2%
Q2 24
3.0%
1.2%
Q1 24
4.8%
2.1%
Cash Conversion
OXM
OXM
PRK
PRK
Q4 25
4.65×
Q3 25
5.00×
1.11×
Q2 25
-0.15×
1.03×
Q1 25
0.90×
Q4 24
4.63×
Q3 24
2.19×
1.14×
Q2 24
0.86×
1.29×
Q1 24
0.99×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

OXM
OXM

Sales Channel Retail$162.9M53%
Sales Channel Wholesale$61.3M20%
Johnny Was$45.4M15%
Sales Channel Food And Beverage$29.3M10%
Other Foreign Countries$9.0M3%

PRK
PRK

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons