vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Caledonia Mining Corp Plc (CMCL) and Maison Solutions Inc. (MSS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Caledonia Mining Corp Plc is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($46.9M vs $27.6M, roughly 1.7× Maison Solutions Inc.). Caledonia Mining Corp Plc runs the higher net margin — 7.0% vs -18.0%, a 25.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Caledonia Mining Corp Plc posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (13.8% vs -10.9%). Over the past eight quarters, Maison Solutions Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (42.5% CAGR vs 17.1%).
Hochschild Mining plc is a leading British-based silver and gold mining business operating in North, Central, and South America. It is headquartered in Lima, Peru, with a corporate office in London, is listed on the London Stock Exchange and is a constituent of the FTSE 250 Index. The main shareholder is the Peruvian businessman Eduardo Hochschild.
Maison Solutions Inc.MSSEarnings & Financial Report
Maison Solutions Inc. is a specialty home goods retail company that provides a diverse portfolio of stylish, affordably priced furniture, home decor items, and daily household products. Its primary market is the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area in China, serving mass consumers through both offline physical stores and online e-commerce channels.
CMCL vs MSS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2024 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $46.9M | $27.6M |
| Net Profit | $3.3M | $-5.0M |
| Gross Margin | 41.2% | 23.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.6% | -4.9% |
| Net Margin | 7.0% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 13.8% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.3% | -1840.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.13 | $-0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $27.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $34.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.9M | $28.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.1M | $16.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $38.5M | $13.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-5.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-1.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-287.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-256.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3M | $700.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $10.2M | $-2.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1M | $-549.0K |
| Q4 25 | — | 23.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 24.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 41.2% | 28.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 45.8% | 13.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 35.9% | 23.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | -4.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -15.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 32.2% | -14.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | -2.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.3% | -16.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | -4.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.06 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-0.01 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.13 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.42 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.07 | $-0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $7.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $2.6M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $231.0M | $11.6M |
| Total Assets | $339.7M | $75.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.22× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $775.4K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $445.4K | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $355.7K | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.2M | $588.9K | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.8M | $9.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $10.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $231.0M | $11.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $231.1M | $10.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $220.3M | $13.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $75.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $73.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $77.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $82.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $339.7M | $82.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $338.5M | $82.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $321.8M | $44.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.23× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.19× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $4.6M | $-1.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.40× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-1.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.6M | $3.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $-2.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.40× | 5.12× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CMCL
Segment breakdown not available.
MSS
| Perishables | $14.4M | 52% |
| Nonperishables | $13.2M | 48% |
