vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vita Coco Company, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($179.8M vs $107.3M, roughly 1.7× DHT Holdings, Inc.). DHT Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 41.7% vs 17.0%, a 24.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs -24.5%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
DHT Holdings, Inc. is an independent international crude oil tanker operator that owns and manages a fleet of very large crude carriers. It offers marine transportation services for crude oil across major global trade routes, serving clients including leading oil producers, refineries, and commodity trading enterprises worldwide.
COCO vs DHT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $107.3M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $44.8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 44.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 41.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | -24.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 27.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $107.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $142.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $44.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $35.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 44.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 29.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 41.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 24.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.22 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $81.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.1B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $81.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $73.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $60.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.36× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $60.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $80.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 2.28× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
DHT
Segment breakdown not available.
