vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and HUTCHMED (China) Ltd (HCM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($270.8M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.5× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 0.7%, a 16.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs -16.5%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
HUTCHMED (China) LtdHCMEarnings & Financial Report
HUTCHMED (China) Ltd is a biopharmaceutical firm focused on discovering, developing and commercializing targeted and immunotherapies for oncology and immunological diseases. It operates across China and global markets, with multiple marketed oncology drugs and a robust pipeline of late-stage clinical candidates addressing unmet patient needs.
COCO vs HCM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $270.8M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $2.0M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | -13.2% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 0.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | -16.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | -83.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.00 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $270.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $277.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $324.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $305.7M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $2.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $455.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $11.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $25.8M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 37.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | 48.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 41.1% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | -13.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | -5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | -9.0% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 163.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 8.4% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.00 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.03 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $93.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.08× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | $836.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | $802.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $93.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $93.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $82.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.1M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $759.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $740.1M |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $8.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 4.21× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-96.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $-72.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $40.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $-39.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $3.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-82.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $32.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $-49.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 1.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | -29.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 10.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | -16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 4.21× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | -0.16× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | 3.38× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | -1.54× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
HCM
Segment breakdown not available.
