vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC (HVT). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
HAVERTY FURNITURE COMPANIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($201.9M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.1× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 4.2%, a 12.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 9.5%). Over the past eight quarters, Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 4.8%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
Furniture Brands International, Inc. was a home furnishings company, headquartered in Clayton, Missouri. The company began in 1911 as International Shoe Company with the merger of Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Company and Peters Shoe Company. In 1966, the company changed its name to Interco as the result of diversification, and once the company exited the shoe business, adopted the name Furniture Brands International. Some of the brands it owned in the furniture industry included Broyhill, Tho...
COCO vs HVT — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $201.9M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $8.5M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 60.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 5.3% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 4.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 9.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 4.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $201.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $194.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $181.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $181.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $184.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $175.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $178.6M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $8.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $4.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $4.4M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 60.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | 60.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 60.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | 61.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 61.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 60.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 60.4% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 3.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 4.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 2.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 2.5% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $125.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $307.9M |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $649.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | $125.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $130.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $107.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | $111.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $120.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $121.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | $109.9M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $307.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $306.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $304.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $305.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $307.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $307.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $307.1M |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $649.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $651.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $642.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $642.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $648.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $659.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $642.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $7.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $3.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.86× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $33.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $7.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $31.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $7.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $6.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $16.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $14.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $28.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $1.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $27.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $9.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $16.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $4.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 14.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 0.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 4.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 9.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 4.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 0.86× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 6.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | 1.63× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 2.06× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 4.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 3.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
HVT
| Upholstery | $91.0M | 45% |
| Bedroom Furniture | $29.2M | 14% |
| Accessories And Other | $28.4M | 14% |
| Dining Room Furniture | $22.8M | 11% |
| Mattresses | $16.1M | 8% |
| Occasional | $14.4M | 7% |
