vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC (PLOW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($184.5M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.0× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 7.0%, a 10.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 28.6%). Over the past eight quarters, DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, INC's revenue compounded faster (38.9% CAGR vs 11.7%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is an American industrial and technology company based in Reston, Virginia. It is primarily a developer and producer of advanced military equipment of a wide variety, such as nuclear submarines, main battle tanks, and armoured fighting vehicles. It is also the manufacturer of the civilian aviation Gulfstream business jets and a provider of information technology services. The company is the 3rd largest of the top 100 contractors of the U.S. federal government...
COCO vs PLOW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $184.5M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 10.5% |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 7.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 28.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 62.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.54 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $184.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $162.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $194.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $115.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $143.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $129.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $199.9M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $8.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $148.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $24.3M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 26.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | 23.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 31.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | 24.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 23.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 30.7% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 10.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 8.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 9.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 35.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 18.2% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 4.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 24.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 12.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.54 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $1.09 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $0.00 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $1.02 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $144.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $281.4M |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $626.7M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.51× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $144.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $147.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $281.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $275.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $273.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $258.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $264.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $260.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $236.7M |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $626.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $694.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $671.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $621.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $590.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $665.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $617.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.51× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.56× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $95.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $92.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 7.47× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $63.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $95.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $-8.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $74.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $-14.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $2.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $92.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $-14.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $-3.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $70.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $-15.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $836.0K |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 50.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | -7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 48.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 0.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 1.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 0.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 7.47× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | -1.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | -0.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | -9.03× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | 9.41× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | -0.44× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 0.10× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
PLOW
| Work Truck Solutions | $101.5M | 55% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $83.1M | 45% |
