vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Vita Coco Company, Inc. (COCO) and ROGERS CORP (ROG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
ROGERS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($200.5M vs $179.8M, roughly 1.1× Vita Coco Company, Inc.). Vita Coco Company, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 17.0% vs 2.2%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vita Coco Company, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (37.3% vs 5.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Vita Coco Company, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs -3.3%).
The Vita Coco Company, doing business simply as Vita Coco, is an American beverage company which mainly sells coconut water. The largest brand globally in coconut/plant waters, Vita Coco has operations in 31 countries as of 2016. It is a benefit corporation. The company is owned by All Market Inc.
Rogers Corporation is a specialty engineered materials company headquartered in Chandler, Arizona.
COCO vs ROG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $179.8M | $200.5M |
| Net Profit | $30.5M | $4.5M |
| Gross Margin | 39.9% | 32.2% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | — |
| Net Margin | 17.0% | 2.2% |
| Revenue YoY | 37.3% | 5.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 61.4% | 421.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.50 | $0.25 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $179.8M | $200.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $127.8M | $201.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $182.3M | $216.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $168.8M | $202.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.9M | $190.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $127.3M | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.9M | $210.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.1M | $214.2M |
| Q1 26 | $30.5M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.5M | $4.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $24.0M | $8.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.9M | $-73.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $18.9M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4M | $-500.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.3M | $10.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.1M | $8.1M |
| Q1 26 | 39.9% | 32.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 34.9% | 31.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 37.7% | 33.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.3% | 31.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.7% | 29.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.5% | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 35.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 34.1% |
| Q1 26 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.3% | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | -33.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | -0.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | -6.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | 6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.8% | 5.3% |
| Q1 26 | 17.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 4.3% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.2% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.6% | -36.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.6% | -0.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.5% | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 3.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.50 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 25 | $0.10 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.40 | $0.48 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.38 | $-4.00 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.31 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.06 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.32 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.32 | $0.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $201.9M | $195.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $352.2M | $1.2B |
| Total Assets | $488.3M | $1.4B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $201.9M | $195.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $196.9M | $197.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $203.7M | $167.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $167.0M | $157.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $153.6M | $175.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $164.7M | $159.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $156.7M | $146.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $150.1M | $119.9M |
| Q1 26 | $352.2M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $331.5M | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $323.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $296.9M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $277.9M | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $258.8M | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $252.1M | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $232.0M | $1.3B |
| Q1 26 | $488.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 25 | $461.2M | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $461.3M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $421.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $384.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $362.4M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $353.1M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $323.0M | $1.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $5.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $1.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 0.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 2.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.29× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $70.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $5.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $46.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.1M | $28.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $13.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.8M | $11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.9M | $33.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.3M | $42.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.9M | $22.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-7.1M | $42.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $35.6M | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.9M | $5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.4M | $2.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8M | $18.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9M | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.6M | $8.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.6% | 20.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 9.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.9% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.7% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 18.5% | 4.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 3.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 4.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 6.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.29× | ||
| Q4 25 | -0.70× | 10.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.63× | 3.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.95× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.52× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.05× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.48× | 3.96× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.41× | 2.83× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
COCO
| Subtotal | $148.2M | 82% |
| Private Label | $24.4M | 14% |
| Other | $7.2M | 4% |
ROG
Segment breakdown not available.
