vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) and Walker & Dunlop, Inc. (WD). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($340.0M vs $268.0M, roughly 1.3× Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd runs the higher net margin — 30.8% vs -12.9%, a 43.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (272.1% vs -0.4%). Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd produced more free cash flow last quarter ($38.5M vs $-680.1M). Over the past eight quarters, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd's revenue compounded faster (124.8% CAGR vs 22.1%).
Seiko Group is a corporate group composed of Seiko Group Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates. It used to be recognized as a corporate group consisting of three core companies Seiko Holdings Corp., Seiko Instruments Inc., and Seiko Epson Corp. The three companies were linked by a common thread of timepiece technology. Although Epson still develops and manufactures wristwatches for the Seiko Group, Epson and its subsidiaries are not considered part of the group.
Walker & Dunlop, Inc. is one of the largest commercial real estate finance and advisory services firms in the United States and internationally.
CRDO vs WD — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $268.0M | $340.0M |
| Net Profit | $82.6M | $-13.9M |
| Gross Margin | 67.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 29.4% | -17.2% |
| Net Margin | 30.8% | -12.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 272.1% | -0.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 2055.9% | -131.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.44 | $-0.41 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $268.0M | $340.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $223.1M | $337.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $170.0M | $319.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.0M | $237.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $72.0M | $341.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $59.7M | $292.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.8M | $270.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $53.1M | $228.1M |
| Q4 25 | $82.6M | $-13.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $63.4M | $33.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | $34.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.4M | $2.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-4.2M | $44.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-9.5M | $28.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-10.5M | $22.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $428.0K | $11.9M |
| Q4 25 | 67.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 67.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 63.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 65.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 61.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 29.4% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 27.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 19.9% | 14.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.4% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -11.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -24.2% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -13.0% | 10.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.1% | 6.0% |
| Q4 25 | 30.8% | -12.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 28.4% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | 10.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -5.9% | 13.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -16.0% | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.8% | 5.2% |
| Q4 25 | $0.44 | $-0.41 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $0.98 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.22 | $0.99 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.16 | $0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.03 | $1.32 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.06 | $0.85 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.06 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.00 | $0.35 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $813.6M | $299.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| Total Assets | $1.4B | $5.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $813.6M | $299.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $479.6M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $431.3M | $233.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $379.2M | $181.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $383.0M | $279.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $398.6M | $179.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $410.0M | $208.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $409.1M | $216.5M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $781.4M | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $681.6M | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $618.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | $567.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $553.1M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $540.2M | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 24 | $534.0M | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $905.2M | $5.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $809.3M | $4.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $719.9M | $4.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $638.6M | $4.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $644.9M | $4.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.9M | $4.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $592.5M | $3.8B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $61.7M | $-664.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $38.5M | $-680.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.4% | -200.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.7% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.75× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $143.6M | $-2.2B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $61.7M | $-664.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.2M | $-948.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $57.8M | $-238.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.2M | $-281.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.3M | $129.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-7.2M | $-202.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $-237.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.0M | $38.4M |
| Q4 25 | $38.5M | $-680.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.3M | $-950.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.2M | $-241.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-383.0K | $-284.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.7M | $116.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-13.1M | $-204.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $962.0K | $-241.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-6.1M | $35.2M |
| Q4 25 | 14.4% | -200.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | -281.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.9% | -75.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.3% | -120.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -16.2% | 34.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.9% | -69.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.6% | -89.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.6% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 1.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 3.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.8% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.3% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.6% | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | 0.75× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | -28.34× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.58× | -7.02× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.14× | -102.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.89× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -7.01× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -10.49× | ||
| Q1 24 | -2.42× | 3.24× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRDO
| Other | $132.1M | 49% |
| HK | $104.4M | 39% |
| RESTOFTHEWORLD | $31.5M | 12% |
WD
Segment breakdown not available.
