vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. (CRUS) and WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC. (WH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($448.5M vs $334.0M, roughly 1.3× WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS, INC.). CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. runs the higher net margin — 18.2% vs -18.0%, a 36.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.7% vs -76.3%). Over the past eight quarters, CIRRUS LOGIC, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs -4.6%).
Cirrus Logic Inc. is an American fabless semiconductor supplier that specializes in analog, mixed-signal, and audio DSP integrated circuits (ICs). Since 1998, the company's headquarters have been in Austin, Texas.
Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Inc., is an American hospitality company based in Parsippany, New Jersey, United States. It describes itself as the largest hotel franchisor in the world, with 9,100 locations.
CRUS vs WH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $448.5M | $334.0M |
| Net Profit | $81.8M | $-60.0M |
| Gross Margin | 53.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | 20.1% | — |
| Net Margin | 18.2% | -18.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 5.7% | -76.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 299.0% | -170.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.56 | $-0.80 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $448.5M | $334.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $580.6M | $334.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $561.0M | $382.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $407.3M | $397.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $424.5M | $316.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $555.7M | $336.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $541.9M | $396.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $374.0M | $367.0M |
| Q1 26 | $81.8M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $140.3M | $-60.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $131.6M | $105.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.7M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.3M | $61.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $116.0M | $85.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $102.1M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.1M | $86.0M |
| Q1 26 | 53.0% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 53.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 52.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 53.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 53.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 50.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.3% | -11.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.8% | 46.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.8% | 37.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.2% | 35.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 26.2% | 38.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.3% | 43.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 39.5% |
| Q1 26 | 18.2% | -18.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 24.2% | -18.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.5% | 27.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.9% | 21.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.8% | 19.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.9% | 25.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.8% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 11.3% | 23.4% |
| Q1 26 | $1.56 | $-0.80 | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.66 | $-0.77 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.48 | $1.36 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.14 | $1.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.30 | $0.78 | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.11 | $1.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.83 | $1.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.76 | $1.07 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $800.9M | $64.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.1B | $468.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $4.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $800.9M | $64.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $778.1M | $64.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $593.5M | $70.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $548.9M | $50.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $539.6M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $526.4M | $103.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $445.8M | $72.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $491.4M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $468.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $468.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $570.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $579.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $650.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.9B | $583.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | $623.0M |
| Q1 26 | $2.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.3B | $4.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $4.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $4.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $4.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 5.37× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.44× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 4.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.72× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 4.19× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.83× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $151.4M | $367.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $168.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 50.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.3% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.85× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $437.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $151.4M | $367.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $290.8M | $152.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $92.2M | $86.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $116.1M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $130.4M | $59.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $218.6M | $134.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $79.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $87.2M | $1.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | $168.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $285.7M | $136.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $88.3M | $75.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $113.5M | $58.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $52.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $211.9M | $109.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.6M | $71.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $77.2M | $-6.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 49.2% | 40.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 19.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.9% | 14.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 16.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.1% | 32.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 17.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.6% | -1.6% |
| Q1 26 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 2.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | 2.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.2% | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.7% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | 1.85× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.70× | 0.82× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.91× | 0.80× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.83× | 0.97× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.88× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.08× | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.07× | 0.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
CRUS
| Audio | $257.2M | 57% |
| High-Performance Mixed-Signal | $191.3M | 43% |
WH
| Fee-related and other revenues | $334.0M | 100% |
| Management and other fees | $2.0M | 1% |
